Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29993035›Full record

ArticleEye (London, England)2018

High-resolution imaging of photoreceptors in healthy human eyes using an adaptive optics retinal camera.

P Tumahai, C Moureaux, M Meillat, G Debellemanière, M Flores, B Delbosc, M Saleh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eye (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Schizophrenia in Translation: Why the Eye?Schizophrenia bulletin · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Assessing Interocular Symmetry of the Foveal Cone Mosaic.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P TumahaiOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, Franche-Comté, France. tumahaiperle@gmail.com.
C MoureauxOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, Franche-Comté, France.
M MeillatOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, Franche-Comté, France.
G DebellemanièreOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, Franche-Comté, France.
M FloresOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, Franche-Comté, France.
B DelboscOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, Franche-Comté, France.
M SalehOphthalmology Department, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, Franche-Comté, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the effects of age on perifoveal cone density in healthy subjects using adaptive optics.

methodsHealthy subjects of various ages were imaged using an adaptive optics retinal camera (RTX-1

resultsOne hundred and sixty-seven eyes of 101 subjects aged 6-78 years were studied. Perifoveal cone density significantly decreased with age (R

conclusionsA moderate perifoveal cone loss occurs with age. The precise consequences of these findings on visual function should be investigated. In addition to a better understanding of normal retinal anatomy, these results could act as a comparative database for further studies on normal and diseased retinas.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAgingChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOphthalmoscopyOptics and PhotonicsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsVisual AcuityYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29993035
PMCPMC6224453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.