Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29993022›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Prediction Models of Cognitive Trajectories in Patients with Nonamnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Jin San Lee, Seong-Kyung Cho, Hee Jin Kim, Yeo Jin Kim, Key-Chung Park, Samuel N Lockhart, Duk L Na, Changsoo Kim, Sang Won Seo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Cognitive trajectories in multiple sclerosis: a long-term follow-up study.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jin San LeeDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Seong-Kyung ChoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Hee Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Yeo Jin KimDepartment of Neurology, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Key-Chung ParkDepartment of Neurology, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Samuel N LockhartDepartment of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0893-5420
Duk L NaDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
Changsoo KimDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Sang Won SeoDepartment of Neurology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, 06351, Korea. sangwonseo@empal.com.
Samsung Medical Center · KRYonsei University · KRHallym University · KRKyung Hee University Dental Hospital · KRWake Forest University · US

Funding

Wake Forest Alzheimer's Disease Core CenterP30AG049638 · NIA · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WILLIAMSON, JEFF DOUGLAS · 2016 to 2020
$12.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG049638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate prediction models of cognitive trajectories in patients with nonamnestic mild cognitive impairment (naMCI) using group-based trajectory analysis, we evaluated 121 patients with naMCI who underwent at least their first three yearly assessments. Group-based trajectory models were used to classify cognitive trajectories based on Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes scores over four years in patients with naMCI. A total of 22 patients (18.2%) were classified into the "fast-decliners" group, while 99 patients (81.8%) were classified into the "slow-decliners" group. The mean age was higher in the fast-decliners than in the slow-decliners (p = 0.037). Compared to the slow-decliners, the fast-decliners were more frequently impaired in the domains of language (p = 0.038) and frontal/executive functions (p = 0.042), and had more frequent multiple-domain cognitive impairment (p = 0.006) on baseline neuropsychological tests. The rate of conversion to dementia was significantly higher in the fast-decliners than in the slow-decliners (86.4% vs. 10.1%, p < 0.001). Our findings showed that there are indeed distinct patterns of cognitive trajectories in patients with naMCI. Close observation of naMCI patients' baseline demographic and clinical profiles in clinical settings may help identify individuals at greatest risk for dementia.

Indexed as

Executive FunctionModels, BiologicalAgedCognitive DysfunctionDementiaDisease ProgressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLanguage DisordersMaleMental Status and Dementia TestsMiddle AgedNeuropsychological TestsRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID29993022
PMCPMC6041284
OpenAlexW2875036487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.