Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29992981›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Engineering biofunctional in vitro vessel models using a multilayer bioprinting technique.

Jan Schöneberg, Federica De Lorenzi, Benjamin Theek, Andreas Blaeser, Dirk Rommel, Alexander J C Kuehne, Fabian Kießling, Horst Fischer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Immunomodulatory Delivery Materials for Tissue Repair.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Droplet-based bioprinting.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan SchönebergDepartment of Dental Materials and Biomaterials Research, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Federica De LorenziInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Benjamin TheekInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Andreas BlaeserDepartment of Dental Materials and Biomaterials Research, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Dirk RommelDWI - Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Alexander J C KuehneDWI - Leibniz Institute for Interactive Materials, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
Fabian KießlingInstitute for Experimental Molecular Imaging, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany.
Horst FischerDepartment of Dental Materials and Biomaterials Research, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. hfischer@ukaachen.de.

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (Federal Ministry of Education and Research) 031A578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in the field of bioprinting have led to the development of perfusable complex structures. However, most of the existing printed vascular channels lack the composition or key structural and physiological features of natural blood vessels or they make use of more easily printable but less biocompatible hydrogels. Here, we use a drop-on-demand bioprinting technique to generate in vitro blood vessel models, consisting of a continuous endothelium imitating the tunica intima, an elastic smooth muscle cell layer mimicking the tunica media, and a surrounding fibrous and collagenous matrix of fibroblasts mimicking the tunica adventitia. These vessel models with a wall thickness of up to 425 µm and a diameter of about 1 mm were dynamically cultivated in fluidic bioreactors for up to three weeks under physiological flow conditions. High cell viability (>83%) after printing and the expression of VE-Cadherin, smooth muscle actin, and collagen IV were observed throughout the cultivation period. It can be concluded that the proposed novel technique is suitable to achieve perfusable vessel models with a biofunctional multilayer wall composition. Such structures hold potential for the creation of more physiologically relevant in vitro disease models suitable especially as platforms for the pre-screening of drugs.

Indexed as

Blood VesselsAnimalsBiomimetic MaterialsBioprintingEndotheliumHumansModels, BiologicalPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringTunica Intima

Identifiers

PMID29992981
PMCPMC6041340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.