Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29992586›Full record

ArticleJPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition2019

The Effect of Additives for Reflux or Dysphagia Management on Osmolality in Ready-to-Feed Preterm Formula: Practice Implications.

Deborah S Levy, Erika Osborn, Kathryn A Hasenstab, Saira Nawaz, Sudarshan R Jadcherla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPEN. Journal of parenteral and enteral nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. [Expert consensus on enteral nutrition management for preterm infants in special situations (2024)].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Neonatal gastroesophageal reflux.Early human development · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Deborah S LevySpeech and Language Pathology, Health and Communication Department, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Erika OsbornInnovative Infant Feeding Disorders Research Program, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Kathryn A HasenstabInnovative Infant Feeding Disorders Research Program, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Saira NawazInnovative Infant Feeding Disorders Research Program, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Sudarshan R JadcherlaInnovative Infant Feeding Disorders Research Program, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Nationwide Children's Hospital · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

The Physiology of the Pharyngo-Esophageal JunctionP01DK068051 · NIDDK · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2007 to 2018
$11.6M
Futures Matter: Transformative Transdisciplinary Summer Research ProgramR25HD086885 · NICHD · RESEARCH INST NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSP · PI ROGERS, LYNETTE KAY · 2016 to 2020
$535k
NICHD NIH HHS R25 HD086885NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK068051
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA common osmolality threshold for feedings is to stay <450 mOsm/kg for normal infants. Preterm formulas are frequently modified to improve growth, modify nutrition, and manage gastroesophageal reflux (GER) or dysphagia. Relationships between osmolality and additives to ready-to-feed preterm formulas are unclear. Our aims were to evaluate and compare the effects of caloric density, thickening agent recipes, and supplements to ready-to-feed preterm formula on osmolality.

methodsA freezing point osmometer was used to measure the osmolality of 47 preterm infant formula combinations with varying caloric densities (ready-to-feed 22 and 30 cal/oz), thickening agents (rice vs oatmeal cereal), thickener amounts (0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 tsp/oz), and combinations of supplements (saline, iron, vitamin D, or multivitamin). Ten samples per combination were tested using a 10-μL pipette. Comparisons were made using analysis of variance and t-tests for group and pair-wise comparisons, respectively.

resultsA total of 470 osmolality samples were analyzed: (1) raters had high agreement (r = 0.98; P < .001); (2) for every 0.5 tsp/oz of thickener, the osmolality increases by 30 mOsm/kg (P < .001); (3) osmolality was higher with the oatmeal (vs rice) thickening agent (P < .001); and (4) vitamin and electrolyte supplement combinations increase osmolality.

conclusionsAlteration of ready-to-feed preterm formulas may significantly increase osmolality and have unintended consequences. Caution and monitoring should be exercised with modifying ready-to-feed preterm formulas for regurgitation, rumination, GER, dysphagia, feeding intolerance, or emesis. This study supports the concept of achieving volume tolerance before further manipulation of additives.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFood AdditivesFood, FormulatedDeglutition DisordersGastroesophageal RefluxHumansInfant FormulaOsmolar ConcentrationFood Additivesinfant feedingosmolalitypreterm formulasupplementsthickening

Identifiers

PMID29992586
PMCPMC6328349
OpenAlexW2840359166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.