Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29992484›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2018

Ocular signatures of proactive versus reactive cognitive control in young adults.

Verónica Mäki-Marttunen, Thomas Hagen, Samira Aminihajibashi, Maja Foldal, Maria Stavrinou, Jens H Halvorsen, Bruno Laeng, Thomas Espeseth

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Toward a formal theory of proactivity.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Verónica Mäki-MarttunenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. makimarttunen.veronica@gmail.com.
Thomas HagenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Samira AminihajibashiDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maja FoldalDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Maria StavrinouDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Jens H HalvorsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Bruno LaengDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas EspesethDepartment of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOOslo University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the execution of a cognitive task, the brain maintains contextual information to guide behavior and achieve desired goals. The AX-Continuous Performance Task is used to study proactive versus reactive cognitive control. Young adults tend to behave proactively in standard testing conditions. However, it remains unclear how interindividual variability (e.g., in cognitive and motivational factors) may drive people into more reactive or proactive control under the same task demands. We investigated the use of control strategies in a large population of healthy young adults. We computed the proactive behavioral index and consequently divided participants into proactive, reactive, and intermediate groups. We found that reactive participants were generally slower, presented lower context sensitivity, and larger response variability. Pupillary changes and blink rate index cognitive effort allocation. We measured, concomitantly to the task, the pupil size and frequency of blinks associated with the cue maintenance and response intervals. During the cue period, nonfrequent, nontarget cues led to increased pupil dilation and number of blinks in all participants. During the response interval, we found more errors and increased pupil dilation to the probe when all participants had to overcome a response bias generated by the frequent cue. Only reactive participants showed larger response-related pupil when they had to overcome a response bias related to the frequent probe. Contrary to expectations, groups did not differ in ocular measures in the cue period. In conclusion, interindividual differences in cognitive control between healthy adults can be mapped onto different patterns of effort allocation indexed by the pupil.

Indexed as

CognitionExecutive FunctionPupilAdolescentAdultBlinkingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReaction TimeYoung AdultAX-CPTCognitive controlEye blinksPupillometry

Identifiers

PMID29992484
OpenAlexW2867059419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.