Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29992448›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2019

Lumbar lordosis does not correlate with pelvic incidence in the cases with the lordosis apex located at L3 or above.

Osamu Tono, Kazuhiro Hasegawa, Masashi Okamoto, Shun Hatsushikano, Haruka Shimoda, Kei Watanabe, Katsumi Harimaya

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of apex and transitional vertebra of the spine according to pelvic incidence using orientation and position parameters.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  10. Pelvic incidence correlates to sagittal spinal morphology in lenke 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and influences the proximal junctional kyphosis rate after correction surgery.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Article
  11. Static and dynamic sagittal lumbar apex: a new concept for the assessment of lumbar lordosis distribution in spinal deformity.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2021
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. The influence of spinopelvic morphologies on sagittal spinal alignment: an analysis of incidence angle of inflection points.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  14. Correlation between the apex of lumbar lordosis and pelvic incidence in asymptomatic adult.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2020
    Article
  15. Predictive formula of ideal lumbar lordosis and lower lumbar lordosis determined by individual pelvic incidence in asymptomatic elderly population.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Osamu TonoNiigata Spine Surgery Center, 2-5-22 Nishi-machi, Konan-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 950-0165, Japan.
Kazuhiro HasegawaNiigata Spine Surgery Center, 2-5-22 Nishi-machi, Konan-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 950-0165, Japan. kazu3795jp@yahoo.co.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-6246-6960
Masashi OkamotoNiigata Spine Surgery Center, 2-5-22 Nishi-machi, Konan-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 950-0165, Japan.
Shun HatsushikanoNiigata Spine Surgery Center, 2-5-22 Nishi-machi, Konan-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 950-0165, Japan.
Haruka ShimodaNiigata Spine Surgery Center, 2-5-22 Nishi-machi, Konan-ku, Niigata City, Niigata, 950-0165, Japan.
Kei WatanabeDivision of Orthopedic Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata City, Niigata, Japan.
Katsumi HarimayaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, Oita, Japan.
Niigata University · JPKyushu University Beppu Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test the hypothesis that the relationship between PI and L1-S1 lumbar lordosis (LL) is always positive, even in cases with different lumbar sagittal profiles.

methodsStanding whole-spine sagittal alignment was measured with EOS system in 100 healthy adults (46 men, 54 women, mean age 40.9 years). The apex of lumbar lordosis was defined as the most anterior lumbar vertebra or intervertebral disk from the gravity line determined by a force plate measurement. Subjects were stratified into three groups: the upper group with an apex between L1 and L3 (UppA, n = 19), the middle group with an apex from L3/4 to L4/5 (MidA, n = 67), and the lower group with an apex at L5 or below (LowA, n = 14). PI, PT, SS, thoracic kyphosis (TK), LL, SVA, T1 pelvic angle, and knee flexion angle were compared between the groups. The correlation between LL and PI in each group was also compared.

resultsPI and SS differed significantly between the three groups, and LL was significantly different between LowA and MidA and UppA. TK and KF did not differ significantly between groups. LL and PI were significantly positively correlated in the MidA and LowA groups, but not in the UppA group.

conclusionContrary to the hypothesis, the correlation coefficient between PI and LL was not significant in the cases with apex above L3, suggesting that the relationship between PI and LL is not always constant, and whole sagittal alignment should be taken into account. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBone MalalignmentCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansLordosisLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedPelvisPostureRadiographyApex of lumbar lordosisHealthy volunteersLumbar lordosisPelvic incidenceSagittal spine profile

Identifiers

PMID29992448
OpenAlexW2862285449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.