Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29992340›Full record

ReviewHNO2018

[Orbital traumatology].

Cordula M C Deichmüller, H-J Welkoborsky

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Cordula M C DeichmüllerKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum, Klinikum Region Hannover GmbH, Klinikum Nordstadt, Haltenhoffstraße 41, 30167, Hannover, Deutschland. hno-deichmueller@t-online.de.
H-J WelkoborskyKlinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf-Hals-Tumorzentrum, Klinikum Region Hannover GmbH, Klinikum Nordstadt, Haltenhoffstraße 41, 30167, Hannover, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the case of trauma to the midface, an accompanying fracture of the orbit is common because to the anatomical conditions (bony buttresses of the midface). Etiology varies according to locoregional conditions. MATERIALS AND

methodsAn overview of orbital traumatology including diagnostic procedures, symptoms and therapy is provided. In addition, our own patient collective over one year including a 5-year follow-up was prospectively analyzed.

resultsThe possible fractures of the midface with involvement of the orbit including their classifications are listed. The key clinical symptoms and the diagnostic procedure are described. As part of the therapeutic management, in addition to the-mostly required-surgical approach, the conservative therapeutic options and prerequisites for conservative therapy are discussed. In our own patients, clear differences in the accident mechanisms were evident. Violence was the most frequent mechanism for younger, male patients, while in female, elderly patients a fall was the reason for the fracture. Overall, 17% of cases received conservative therapy and 83% underwent surgical treatment.

conclusionTraumatology of the orbit requires that therapeutic decisions be made on an individual patient basis. Even a conservative regime can lead to good results. The treatment of fractures of the orbit and the midface should be in the hands of experienced midface surgeons due to the technical competence with regard to the anatomy of the neighboring structures.

Indexed as

Fractures, BoneOrbital FracturesTraumatologyAccidental FallsAgedFemaleHumansMaleOrbitComminuted fracturesFacial injuriesOrbital fracturesTraumatologyZygomatic fractures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.