Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29992320›Full record

ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2018

Identifying frequent patterns in biochemical reaction networks: a workflow.

Fabienne Lambusch, Dagmar Waltemath, Olaf Wolkenhauer, Kurt Sandkuhl, Christian Rosenke, Ron Henkel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Discovering subnetworks in SBML models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Notions of similarity for systems biology models.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fabienne LambuschBusiness Information Systems, University of Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Dagmar WaltemathDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Olaf WolkenhauerDepartment of Systems Biology and Bioinformatics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Kurt SandkuhlBusiness Information Systems, University of Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Christian RosenkeVisual Computing and Computer Graphics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Germany.
Ron HenkelScientific Databases and Visualization, Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computational models in biology encode molecular and cell biological processes. Many of these models can be represented as biochemical reaction networks. Studying such networks, one is mostly interested in systems that share similar reactions and mechanisms. Typical goals of an investigation thus include understanding of model parts, identification of reoccurring patterns and recognition of biologically relevant motifs. The large number and size of available models, however, require automated methods to support researchers in achieving their goals. Specifically for the problem of finding patterns in large networks only partial solutions exist. We propose a workflow that identifies frequent structural patterns in biochemical reaction networks encoded in the Systems Biology Markup Language. The workflow utilizes a subgraph mining algorithm to detect the network patterns. Once patterns are identified, the textual pattern description can automatically be converted into a graphical representation. Furthermore, information about the distribution of patterns among a selected set of models can be retrieved. The workflow was validated with 575 models from the curated branch of BioModels. In this paper, we highlight interesting and frequent structural patterns. Furthermore, we provide exemplary patterns that incorporate terms from the Systems Biology Ontology. Our workflow can be applied to a custom set of models or to models already existing in our graph database MaSyMoS. The occurrences of frequent patterns may give insight into the encoding of central biological processes, evaluate postulated biological motifs or serve as a similarity measure for models that share common structures.Database URL: https://github.com/FabienneL/BioNet-Mining.

Indexed as

Biochemical PhenomenaPattern Recognition, AutomatedWorkflowAlgorithmsDatabases as TopicData MiningPeptidesPhosphorylationProtein BiosynthesisRNA, MessengerRNA StabilityTranscription, GeneticPeptidesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID29992320
PMCPMC6030809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.