ArticleProtein engineering, design & selection : PEDS2018
Molecular dynamics-derived rotamer libraries for d-amino acids within homochiral and heterochiral polypeptides.
Article in Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bayesian Framework with Dirichlet Priors and Spatial Smoothing for Protein Rotamer Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- FakeRotLib: Expedient Noncanonical Amino Acid Parametrization in Rosetta.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- The design of functional proteins using tensorized energy calculations.Cell reports methods · 2023Article
- Building protein structure-specific rotamer libraries.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Molecular Dynamics Methods for Antibody Design.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- The role of α-sheet structure in amyloidogenesis: characterization and implications.Open biology · 2022Review
- Insights from molecular dynamics simulations for computational protein design.Molecular systems design & engineering · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational resources have contributed to the design and engineering of novel proteins by integrating genomic, structural and dynamic aspects of proteins. Non-canonical amino acids, such as d-amino acids, expand the available sequence space for designing and engineering proteins; however, the rotamer libraries for d-amino acids are usually constructed as the mirror images of l-amino acid rotamer libraries, an assumption that has not been tested. To this end, we have performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of model host-guest peptide systems containing d-amino acids. Our simulations systematically address the applicability of the mirror image convention as well as the effects of neighboring residue chirality. Rotamer libraries derived from these systems provide realistic rotamer distributions suitable for use in both rational and computational design workflows. Our simulations also address the impact of chirality on the intrinsic conformational preferences of amino acids, providing fundamental insights into the relationship between chirality and biomolecular dynamics. While d-amino acids are rare in naturally occurring proteins, they are used in designed proteins to stabilize a desired conformation, increase bioavailability or confer favorable biochemical and physical attributes. Here, we present d-amino acid rotamer libraries derived from MD simulations of alanine-based host-guest pentapeptides and show how certain residues can deviate from mirror image symmetry. Our simulations directly model d-amino acids as guest residues within the chiral l-Ala and d-Ala pentapeptide series to explicitly incorporate any contributions resulting from the chiralities of neighboring residues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.