Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29992097›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018

Evaluation of dairy processing wastewater biotreatment in an IASBR system: Aeration rate impacts on performance and microbial ecology.

Beatriz Gil-Pulido, Emma Tarpey, Eduardo L Almeida, William Finnegan, Xinmin Zhan, Alan D W Dobson, Niall O'Leary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Beatriz Gil-PulidoSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, College Road, Cork T12 YN60, Ireland.
Emma TarpeyCollege of Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.
Eduardo L AlmeidaSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, College Road, Cork T12 YN60, Ireland.
William FinneganCollege of Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.
Xinmin ZhanCollege of Engineering and Informatics, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, Galway H91 TK33, Ireland.
Alan D W DobsonSchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, College Road, Cork T12 YN60, Ireland.
Niall O'LearySchool of Microbiology, University College Cork, College Road, Cork T12 YN60, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dairy processing generates large volumes of wastewater that require extensive nutrient remediation prior to discharge. Significant commercial opportunities exist therefore for cost-effective biotechnologies capable of achieving this requirement. In this study the authors evaluated the use of intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors, (IASBRs), as a single-tank biotreatment system for co-removal of COD, nitrogen and phosphorus from synthetic dairy processing wastewater. Variation of the IASBR aeration rates, (0.8, 0.6 and 0.4 L/min), had significant impacts on the respective nutrient removal efficiencies and underlying microbial diversity profiles. Aeration at 0.6 L/min was most effective and resulted in >90% co-removal of orthophosphate and ammonium. 16S rRNA based pyrosequencing of biomass DNA samples revealed the family

Indexed as

Biological nutrient removal (BNR)BiotreatmentComamonadaceaeDairy wastewaterIntermittently aerated sequencing batch reactor (IASBR)Sludge biomass

Identifiers

PMID29992097
PMCPMC6036646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.