ArticleGastroenterology & hepatology2018
A Review of Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis.
Article in Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Risk prediction model for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Aggressive hydration compared to standard hydration with lactated ringer's solution for prevention of post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Pooled it
- Post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: A systematic review for prevention and treatment.World journal of gastroenterology · 2019Pooled it
- Review
- Preventing Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: A Pragmatic Clinical Pathway from Periprocedural Prophylaxis to Early Postprocedural Triage.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- The role of AI models in enhancing choledocholithiasis diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2025Article
- Does out of Hours Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Lead to Higher Pancreatitis and Hospitalization Rates?ANZ journal of surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Impact of major duodenal papilla morphology on the outcomes of primary needle-knife fistulotomy for deep biliary cannulation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Analysis of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for the treatment of pediatric pancreatobiliary diseases.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2024Article
- Endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy versus choledochoduodenostomy for malignant biliary obstruction: A meta-analysis.DEN open · 2024Review
- Evaluation of Development of Nonalcoholic Fatty Pancreas Disease After Post-Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiop ancreatography Pancreatitis in Liver Transplant Patients: Computerized Tomography Versus Ultrasound.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Best practices for prevention of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2021Review
- Pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: A narrative review.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model and scoring system for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Acute distal common bile duct angle is risk factor for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis in beginner endoscopist.World journal of clinical cases · 2020Article
- Is MRCP necessary to diagnose pancreas divisum?BMC medical imaging · 2019Article
- A comparison of balloon- versus stent-based approach for dominant strictures in primary sclerosing cholangitis: a meta-analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a diagnostic and therapeutic procedure employed in the management of disorders of the biliary system. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common complication of ERCP and can lead to significant morbidity as well as occasional mortality. In addition to adequate procedural training, therapeutic endoscopists who perform ERCPs should possess a thorough understanding of patient- and procedure-related risk factors for PEP. This knowledge can inform patient selection for ERCP and allow for appropriate management efforts to be performed in high-risk cases. Procedural techniques promoting minimally traumatic biliary cannulation should be employed when initial standard techniques are unsuccessful. In high-risk patients, several measures can be undertaken to limit the risk of PEP, including administration of rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, prophylactic placement of pancreatic duct stents, and liberal administration of lactated Ringer solution. When PEP does occur, appropriate management with aggressive intravenous hydration, pain control, and early enteral nutrition should be administered. Additional research is needed to further define risk factors for PEP, optimal procedural techniques used during ERCP, and ideal prevention and treatment strategies to limit the incidence and severity of PEP in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29991936PMC6034611What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.