Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991808›Full record

ArticleNature chemistry2018

Author Correction: Foldamers wave to the ribosome.

Alanna Schepartz

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alanna SchepartzDepartment of Chemistry, Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, USA. alanna.schepartz@yale.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the News & Views 'Foldamers wave to the ribosome', multiple changes to the main text were required. In paragraph 2 "whose monomer sequence is truly defined" should have read "whose monomer sequence is both diverse and truly defined" and "Truly sequence-defined..." should have read "Diverse and truly sequence defined…". In the penultimate paragraph, 'appendages 5-9' should have been "appendages 5 and 7-9"; in the sentence starting "Based on these criteria...", QPQ should have been QQQ and vice versa; and the whole sentence starting "What is interesting..." needed revising to "What is interesting is that an alternating sequence with a terminal P monomer appears essential: PQPQ is unfolded and an initiator tRNA carrying PQPQ-Gly-Phe initiates translation, whereas QPQPQ is folded and does not." Furthermore, the structures in Fig. 1a have been replaced to correct several errors in the chemical structures arising from missing -CH

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.