Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991718›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2018

Oncogenic addiction to high 26S proteasome level.

Peter Tsvetkov, Julia Adler, Nadav Myers, Assaf Biran, Nina Reuven, Yosef Shaul

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Proteasome stress activates YAP/TAZ through the RAP2-MAP4Ks-LATS1/2 pathway and its therapeutic implications in solid tumors.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Peter TsvetkovDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7577-2342
Julia AdlerDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Nadav MyersDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Assaf BiranDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.
Nina ReuvenDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-1569-3818
Yosef ShaulDepartment of Molecular Genetics, Weizmann Institute of Science, 76100, Rehovot, Israel. yosef.shaul@weizmann.ac.il.
Weizmann Institute of Science · ILBroad Institute · US

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (ISF) 1591/15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteasomes are large intracellular complexes responsible for the degradation of cellular proteins. The altered protein homeostasis of cancer cells results in increased dependency on proteasome function. The cellular proteasome composition comprises the 20S catalytic complex that is frequently capped with the 19S regulatory particle in forming the 26S proteasome. Proteasome inhibitors target the catalytic barrel (20S) and thus this inhibition does not allow the deconvolution of the distinct roles of 20S versus 26S proteasomes in cancer progression. We examined the degree of dependency of cancer cells specifically to the level of the 26S proteasome complex. Oncogenic transformation of human and mouse immortalized cells with mutant Ras induced a strong posttranscriptional increase of the 26S proteasome subunits, giving rise to high 26S complex levels. Depletion of a single subunit of the 19S RP was sufficient to reduce the 26S proteasome level and lower the cellular 26S/20S ratio. Under this condition the viability of the Ras-transformed MCF10A cells was severely compromised. This observation led us to hypothesize that cancer cell survival is dependent on maximal utilization of its 26S proteasomes. We validated this possibility in a large number of cancer cell lines and found that partial reduction of the 26S proteasome level impairs viability in all cancer cells examined and was not correlated with cell doubling time or reduction efficiency. Interstingly, normal human fibroblasts are refractory to the same type of 26S proteasome reduction. The suppression of 26S proteasomes in cancer cells activated the UPR and caspase-3 and cells stained positive with Annexin V. In addition, suppression of the 26S proteasome resulted in cellular proteasome redistribution, cytoplasm shrinkage, and nuclear deformation, the hallmarks of apoptosis. The observed tumor cell-specific addiction to the 26S proteasome levels sets the stage for future strategies in exploiting this dependency in cancer therapy.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnnexin A5Caspase 3Cell LineCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalCytoplasmCytosolHumansMiceNIH 3T3 CellsProteasome Endopeptidase ComplexTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsAnnexin A5ATP dependent 26S proteaseCaspase 3Proteasome Endopeptidase ComplexPSMA4 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29991718
PMCPMC6039477
OpenAlexW2953191511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.