Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991704›Full record

ReviewJournal of human hypertension2018

Impact of SPRINT results on hypertension guidelines: implications for "frail" elderly patients.

Gennaro Russo, Ilaria Liguori, Luisa Aran, Giulia Bulli, Francesco Curcio, Gianluigi Galizia, Gaetano Gargiulo, Gianluca Testa, Andrea Ungar, Francesco Cacciatore and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Brazilian Guidelines of Hypertension - 2020.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2021
    Article
  12. Frailty and hypertension in older adults: current understanding and future perspectives.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gennaro RussoDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Ilaria LiguoriDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Luisa AranDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Giulia BulliDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Francesco CurcioDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Gianluigi GaliziaIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri- Syncope unit - UOC Cure sub-acute, Milan, Italy.
Gaetano GargiuloDivision of Internal Medicine, AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi di Aragona, Salerno, Italy.
Gianluca TestaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Andrea UngarAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
Francesco CacciatoreDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Domenico BonaduceDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Pasquale AbeteDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy. p.abete@unina.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last years, guidelines for the treatment of hypertension recommended individualized blood pressure goals for geriatric population because of elderly susceptibility to adverse outcomes and higher mortality rate deriving from the excessive blood pressure lowering, especially in "frail" elderly. Recent findings from the SPRINT study, which demonstrated that intensive blood pressure lowering was associated with lower rates of cardiovascular events and mortality in both hypertensive fit and frail elderly subjects compared to standard treatment, heavily influenced the recent US guidelines. In SPRINT sub-study analysis of adults aged ≥75 years, the most controversial issue appears the method of blood pressure measurement, the selection of patients and related-frailty degree that appears to be very light. Accordingly, it has been described that light frailty is related to good outcomes in older adults. SPRINT findings in "frail elderly patients" cannot be applied to the clinical practice because this condition has been clearly under-estimated. Thus, frailty status should be routinely and correctly quantified in order to identify the frailty degree and to find the best harms-benefits balance of antihypertensive drug treatment in frail older adults.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsHumansHypertensionObservational Studies as TopicPractice Guidelines as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.