Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991634›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Endovascular treatment for symptomatic intracranial artery stenosis: protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Tao Wang, Xue Wang, Kun Yang, Jing Zhang, Jichang Luo, Peng Gao, Yan Ma, Liqun Jiao, Feng Ling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tao Wang *Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xue Wang *Medical Library, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, UK.
Kun YangDepartment of Evidence-Based Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jichang LuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8341-0966
Peng GaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yan MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Liqun JiaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-4982-6295
Feng LingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAtherosclerotic intracranial artery stenosis (ICAS) is one of most common causes of stroke, which is the second-leading cause of death worldwide. Medical, surgical and endovascular therapy are three major treatments for ICAS. Currently, medical therapy is considered as the standard of care for most patients with ICAS, while extracranial to intracranial bypass is only used in rare situations. Balloon angioplasty alone, balloon-mounted stent and self-expanding stent, collectively called endovascular treatment, have shown promising potentials in treating specific subgroups of patients with symptomatic ICAS; however, their comparative safety and efficacy is still unclear. Therefore, a systematic review with network meta-analysis is needed to establish a hierarchy of these endovascular treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols was followed to establish this protocol. The search will be limited to studies published from 1 January 2000 to the formal search date. Major databases including Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, conference proceedings and grey literature database will be searched for clinical studies comparing at least two interventions for patients with symptomatic ICAS. Primary outcomes include short-term and long-term mortality or stroke rate. Random effects pairwise and network meta-analyses of included studies will be performed on STATA (V.14, StataCorp, 2015). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve and mean rank will be calculated in order to establish a hierarchy of the endovascular treatments. Evaluation of the risk of bias, heterogeneity, consistency, transitivity and quality of evidence will follow the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not needed as systematic review is based on published studies. Study findings will be presented at international conferences and published on a peer-reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42018084055; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonEndovascular ProceduresIntracranial ArteriosclerosisStentsStrokeConstriction, PathologicHumansIschemic Attack, TransientMortalityNetwork Meta-Analysis as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsSystematic Reviews as Topicballoon angioplastyballoon-mounted stentendovascular treatmentintracranial artery stenosisnetwork meta-analysisself-expanding stent

Identifiers

PMID29991634
PMCPMC6089297
OpenAlexW2850622046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.