Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991507›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2018

Comparison of Nuclear Matrix and Mitotic Chromosome Scaffold Proteins in

Rahul Sureka, Rashi Wadhwa, Suman S Thakur, Rashmi U Pathak, Rakesh K Mishra

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nuclear architecture and the structural basis of mitotic memory.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  2. Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. STAR protocols · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rahul SurekaFrom the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-500007, India.
Rashi WadhwaFrom the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-500007, India.
Suman S ThakurFrom the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-500007, India.
Rashmi U PathakFrom the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-500007, India rashmi@ccmb.res.in.
Rakesh K MishraFrom the Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Uppal Road, Hyderabad-500007, India mishra@ccmb.res.in.ORCID 0000-0001-6636-7380
Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromatin condenses several folds to form mitotic chromosomes during cell division and decondenses post-mitotically to reoccupy their nuclear territory and regain their specific transcriptional profile in a precisely lineage specific manner. This necessitates that the features of nuclear architecture and DNA topology persist through mitosis. We compared the proteome of nuclease and high salt resistant fraction of interphase nucleus known as nuclear matrix (NuMat) and an equivalent biochemical fraction in the mitotic chromosome known as mitotic chromosome scaffold (MiCS). Our study elucidates that as much as 67% of the NuMat proteins are retained in the MiCS indicating that the features of nuclear architecture in interphase nucleus are retained on the mitotic chromosomes. Proteins of the NuMat/MiCS have large dynamic range of MS signal and were detected in sub-femtomolar amounts. Chromatin/RNA binding proteins with hydrolase and helicase activity are highly enriched in NuMat as well as MiCS. Although several transcription factors involved in functioning of interphase nucleus are present exclusively in NuMat, protein components responsible for assembly of membrane-less nuclear bodies are uniquely retained in MiCS. Our study clearly indicates that the features of nuclear architecture, in the structural context of NuMat, are retained in MiCS and possibly play an important role in maintenance of cell lineage specific transcriptional status during cell division and thereby, serve as components of cellular memory.

Indexed as

MitosisAnimalsChromosomesDrosophila melanogasterElectrophoresis, Gel, Two-DimensionalNuclear MatrixProteomeQuality ControlTandem Mass SpectrometryProteomeCell cycleCellulra memoryChromatin function or biologyDrosophilaDrosophila S2 cellGene ExpressionMitotic chromosome scaffoldNuclear MatrixStructural BiologySubcellular analysis

Identifiers

PMID29991507
PMCPMC6166678
OpenAlexW2865840995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.