Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991445›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2018

Decoding selective attention to context memory: An aging study.

Patrick S Powell, Jonathan Strunk, Taylor James, Sean M Polyn, Audrey Duarte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Hyper-Binding: Older Adults Form Too Many Associations, Not Too Few.Current directions in psychological science · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sensitivity of Reality Monitoring to Fluency: Evidence from Behavioral Performance and Event-Related Potential (ERP) Old/New Effects.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick S PowellGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, 654 Cherry Street NW, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0170, United States. Electronic address: patrick.powell@psych.gatech.edu.
Jonathan StrunkGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, 654 Cherry Street NW, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0170, United States.
Taylor JamesGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, 654 Cherry Street NW, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0170, United States.
Sean M PolynVanderbilt University, Department of Psychology, PMB 407817, 2301 Vanderbilt Place, Nashville, TN, 37240-7817, United States.
Audrey DuarteGeorgia Institute of Technology, School of Psychology, 654 Cherry Street NW, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0170, United States.
Georgia Institute of Technology · USVanderbilt University · US

Funding

RESEARCH TRAINING IN COGNITIVE AGINGT32AG000175 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DUARTE, AUDREY · 1988 to 2020
$5.6M
Aging and components of cognitive control in associative memoryR56AG049793 · NIA · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI DUARTE, AUDREY · 2016 to 2016
$425k
NIA NIH HHS R56 AG049793NIA NIH HHS T32 AG000175
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emerging evidence has suggested that the tendency for older adults to bind too much contextual information during encoding (i.e., hyper-binding) may contribute to poorer memory for relevant contextual information during retrieval. While these findings are consistent with theories of age-related declines in selective attention and inhibitory control, the degree to which older adults are able to selectively attend to relevant contextual information during encoding is unknown. To better understand the neural dynamics associated with selective attention during encoding, the current study applied multivariate pattern analyses (MVPA) to oscillatory EEG in order to track moment-to-moment shifts of attention between relevant and irrelevant contextual information during encoding. Young and older adults studied pictures of objects in the presence of two contextual features: a color and a scene, and their attention was directed to the object's relationship with one of those contexts (i.e., target context). Results showed that patterns of oscillatory power successfully predicted whether selective attention was directed to a scene or color, across age groups. Individual differences in overall classification performance were associated with individual differences in target context memory accuracy during retrieval. However, changes in classification performance within a trial, suggestive of fluctuations in selective attention, predicted individual differences in hyper-binding. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to use MPVA techniques to decode attention during episodic encoding and the impact of attentional shifts toward distracting information on age-related context memory impairments and hyper-binding. These results are consistent with the as-of-yet unsubstantiated theory that age-related declines in context memory may be attributable to poorer selective attention and/or greater inhibitory deficits in older adults.

Indexed as

Memory, EpisodicAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAgingAlpha RhythmAttentionBeta RhythmCerebral CortexColor PerceptionElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMental RecallAgingAttentionContext memoryEncodingHyper-bindingMVPA

Identifiers

PMID29991445
PMCPMC6468982
OpenAlexW2951734157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.