Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991354›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Births and induced abortions among women of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin, and the general population in Finland -comparison of self-reported and register data.

Satu Jokela, Eero Lilja, Tarja I Kinnunen, Mika Gissler, Anu E Castaneda, Päivikki Koponen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Use of Health Services and Unmet Need among Adults of Russian, Somali, and Kurdish Origin in Finland.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  6. Changes in the Prevalence of Induced Abortion in the Floating Population in Major Cities of China 2007-2014.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Satu JokelaDepartment of Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, PL 30, Finland. satu.jokela@thl.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0613-3125
Eero LiljaDepartment of Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, PL 30, Finland.
Tarja I KinnunenFaculty of Social Sciences, University of Tampere, PL 100, Arvo Ylpön katu 34, Tampere, 33520, Finland.
Mika GisslerDepartment of Information Services, National Institute for Health and Welfare, PL 30, Mannerheimintie 166, Helsinki, 00271, Finland.
Anu E CastanedaDepartment of Welfare, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, PL 30, Finland.
Päivikki KoponenDepartment of Public Health Solutions, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Mannerheimintie 166, 00271, Helsinki, PL 30, Finland.
Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare · FIKarolinska Institutet · SETampere University · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince reproductive health is often considered a highly sensitive topic, underreporting in surveys and under coverage of register data occurs frequently. This may lead to inaccurate information about the reproductive health. This study compares the proportion of women having births and induced abortions among migrant women of Russian, Somali and Kurdish origin in Finland to women in the general Finnish population and examines the agreement between survey- and register-based data.

methodsThe survey data from the Migrant Health and Wellbeing Study conducted in 2010-2012 and data from the Health 2011 Survey with corresponding information on women in the general population were used in this study. The respondents were women aged 18-64: 341 Russian, 176 Somali and 228 Kurdish origin women and 630 women in the general population. The survey data were linked to the Finnish Medical Birth Register and the Register of Induced Abortions.

resultsIn the combined (survey and register) data, migrant groups aged 30-64 had a higher proportion (89-96%) compared to the general population (69%) of women with at least one birth. Under-coverage of registered births was observed in all study groups. Among women aged 18-64, 36% of the Russian group and 24% of the Kurdish group reported more births in the survey than in the register data. In the combined data, the proportions of Russian origin (69%) and Kurdish origin (38%) women who have had at least one induced abortion in their lifetime are higher than in the general population (21%). Under-reporting of induced abortions in survey was observed among Somali origin women aged 18-29 (1% vs. 18%). The level of agreement between survey and register data was the lowest for induced abortions among the Somali and Russian groups (- 0.01 and 0.27).

conclusionBoth survey- and register-based information are needed in studies on reproductive health, especially when comparing women with foreign origin with women in the general population. Culturally sensitive survey protocols need to be developed to reduce reporting bias.

Indexed as

Reproductive HealthAbortion, InducedAdultBirth RateContraceptionFemaleFinlandHealth Services AccessibilityHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedMiddle EastPregnancyRegistriesRisk FactorsRussia(5) reproductive healthInduced abortionMigrantsParturitionWomen

Identifiers

PMID29991354
PMCPMC6038285
OpenAlexW2835443724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.