Trial reportBMC medicine2018
Optimising first- and second-line treatment strategies for untreated major depressive disorder - the SUN☺D study: a pragmatic, multi-centre, assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Strategic Use of New Generation Antidepressants for Depression
Association of Peripheral Immune Cells With Antidepressant Treatment Response
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Second-step strategies in antidepressant pharmacotherapy : Results of current meta-analyses].Der Nervenarzt · 2025Pooled it
- Association between antidepressant use during pregnancy and miscarriage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2024Pooled it
- Combining Antidepressants vs Antidepressant Monotherapy for Treatment of Patients With Acute Depression: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA psychiatry · 2022Pooled it
- Association between peripheral inflammation and free-water imaging in Major Depressive Disorder before and after ketamine treatment - A pilot study.Journal of affective disorders · 2022Trial
- Pretreatment Reward Sensitivity and Frontostriatal Resting-State Functional Connectivity Are Associated With Response to Bupropion After Sertraline Nonresponse.Biological psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Trial
- Prediction of remission in pharmacotherapy of untreated major depression: development and validation of multivariable prediction models.Psychological medicine · 2019Trial
- New Personalized Medicine Model for Medication Management.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Neuroplasticity and Mechanisms of Action of Acute and Chronic Treatment with Antidepressants in Preclinical Studies.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Thoughtful prescribing for patients with difficult-to-treat depression.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023Article
- Complexities of treatment-resistant depression: cautionary notes and promising avenues.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2023Article
- Measuring the performance of prediction models to personalize treatment choice.Statistics in medicine · 2023Article
- Clinical Guideline (CANMAT 2016) Discordance of Medications for Patients with Major Depressive Disorder in China.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Article
- Depression in Sub-Saharan Africa.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Impact of CYP2C19 metaboliser status on SSRI response: a retrospective study of 9500 participants of the Australian Genetics of Depression Study.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Article
- Sex Differences in the Behavioral, Molecular, and Structural Effects of Ketamine Treatment in Depression.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Review
- Meta-analysis overstates benefit of antidepressant combination therapy with α2-antagonists and reuptake inhibitors in major depression.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- The safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A on the treatment of depression.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- Perilla Oil andMethods and protocols · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor patients starting treatment for depression, current guidelines recommend titrating the antidepressant dosage to the maximum of the licenced range if tolerated. When patients do not achieve remission within several weeks, recommendations include adding or switching to another antidepressant. However, the relative merits of these guideline strategies remain unestablished.
methodsThis multi-centre, open-label, assessor-blinded, pragmatic trial involved two steps. Step 1 used open-cluster randomisation, allocating clinics into those titrating sertraline up to 50 mg/day or 100 mg/day by week 3. Step 2 used central randomisation to allocate patients who did not remit after 3 weeks of treatment to continue sertraline, to add mirtazapine or to switch to mirtazapine. The primary outcome was depression severity measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (scores between 0 and 27; higher scores, greater depression) at week 9. We applied mixed-model repeated-measures analysis adjusted for key baseline covariates.
resultsBetween December 2010 and March 2015, we recruited 2011 participants with hitherto untreated major depression at 48 clinics in Japan. In step 1, 970 participants were allocated to the 50 mg/day and 1041 to the 100 mg/day arms; 1927 (95.8%) provided primary outcomes. There was no statistically significant difference in the adjusted PHQ-9 score at week 9 between the 50 mg/day arm and the 100 mg/day arm (0.25 point, 95% confidence interval (CI), - 0.58 to 1.07, P = 0.55). Other outcomes proved similar in the two groups. In step 2, 1646 participants not remitted by week 3 were randomised to continue sertraline (n = 551), to add mirtazapine (n = 537) or to switch to mirtazapine (n = 558): 1613 (98.0%) provided primary outcomes. At week 9, adding mirtazapine achieved a reduction in PHQ-9 scores of 0.99 point (0.43 to 1.55, P = 0.0012); switching achieved a reduction of 1.01 points (0.46 to 1.56, P = 0.0012), both relative to continuing sertraline. Combination increased the percentage of remission by 12.4% (6.1 to 19.0%) and switching by 8.4% (2.5 to 14.8%). There were no differences in adverse effects.
conclusionsIn patients with new onset depression, we found no advantage of titrating sertraline to 100 mg vs 50 mg. Patients unremitted by week 3 gained a small benefit in reduction of depressive symptoms at week 9 by switching sertraline to mirtazapine or by adding mirtazapine.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01109693 . Registered on 23 April 2010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.