Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29991060›Full record

GuidelineRespiration; international review of thoracic diseases2018

Endobronchial Coils for Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction: Best Practice Recommendations from an Expert Panel.

Dirk-Jan Slebos, Nick H Ten Hacken, Martin Hetzel, Felix J F Herth, Pallav L Shah

Open access · hybridAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Interventional pulmonology for chronic inflammatory airway diseases.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Surgical and bronchoscopic pulmonary function-improving procedures in lung emphysema.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Airway granulation response to lung-implantable medical devices: a concise overview.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Dirk-Jan SlebosDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands.
Nick H Ten HackenDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Groningen, the Netherlands.
Martin HetzelKrankenhaus vom Roten Kreuz, Stuttgart, Germany.
Felix J F HerthThoraxklinik and Translational Lung Research Center (TLRC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pallav L ShahRoyal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBHeidelberg University · DEKrankenhaus vom Roten Kreuz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endobronchial coils are an additional treatment option for lung volume reduction in patients with severe emphysema. Patient selection should be focused on patients with severe emphysema on optimal medical therapy and with evidence of severe hyperinflation. The technique is suitable in a broad range of patients with emphysema; however, patients with paraseptal emphysema, large focal (giant) bullae, significant co-morbidity and airway-predominant disease should be avoided. Treatment involves placing between 10 and 14 coils by bronchoscopy in the selected treatment lobe, with 2 lobes being treated sequentially. Lobe selection for treatment should be based on quantitative computed tomography, and the lobes with the greatest destruction should be targeted (excluding the right middle lobe). The treatment results in an improvement in pulmonary function, exercise performance and quality of life, particularly in patients with severe hyperinflation (residual volume > 200% predicted) and upper-lobe heterogeneous emphysema, but will also be of benefit in lower-lobe predominant and homogeneous emphysema. Finally, it has an acceptable safety profile, although special attention has to be paid to coil-associated opacity which is an inflammatory response that occurs in some patients treated with endobronchial coils.

Indexed as

BronchoscopyExercise ToleranceHumansLungPatient SelectionPneumonectomyPulmonary EmphysemaTomography, X-Ray ComputedBronchoscopyCOPDEndobronchial coilsEndoscopic lung volume reductionSevere emphysema

Identifiers

PMID29991060
PMCPMC6530543
OpenAlexW2814748457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.