Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29990994›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of nephrology2018

Gender and Racial Disparities in Initial Hemodialysis Access and Outcomes in Incident End-Stage Renal Disease Patients.

Silvi Shah, Anthony C Leonard, Karthikeyan Meganathan, Annette L Christianson, Charuhas V Thakar

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of nephrology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sex and Gender Disparities in Kidney Transplantation.Advances in kidney disease and health · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Why do we keep ignoring sex in kidney disease?Clinical kidney journal · 2023
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Silvi ShahDivision of Nephrology Kidney C.A.R.E. Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Anthony C LeonardDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Karthikeyan MeganathanDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Annette L ChristiansonDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Charuhas V ThakarDivision of Nephrology Kidney C.A.R.E. Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
University of Cincinnati · USCincinnati VA Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundArteriovenous (AV) access confers survival benefits over central venous catheters (CVC) in hemodialysis patients. Although chronic kidney disease disproportionately affects women and racial minorities, disparities in the -utilization of hemodialysis access across Asians, Native Americans, Hispanics, blacks, and whites among males and females after accounting for pre-dialysis health are not well studied.

methodsWe evaluated 885,699 patients with end-stage renal disease who initiated hemodialysis between January 1, 2004 and December 31, 2014 using the US Renal Data System. Multivariable logistic regression models -adjusted for pre-dialysis health were used to test the associations between gender and race on type of vascular access (AV access vs. CVC, and AV fistula vs. AV graft) at hemodialysis initiation as primary outcome, and on 1-year mortality as a secondary outcome.

resultsMean age was 65 ± 14 years. Females were less likely to use AV access for hemodialysis initiation than were males (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.84-0.86). Compared to whites, adjusted odds of AV access for hemodialysis initiation were higher in blacks (OR 1.08; 95% CI 1.07-1.70), Asians (OR 1.11; 95% CI 1.07-1.14); and lower in Hispanics (OR 0.89; 95% CI 0.87-0.90). There was no -significant difference in mortality between males and females. Compared to whites, 1-year adjusted mortality was lower in Asians (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.53-0.56), blacks (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.66-0.68), Hispanics (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.61-0.63), and Native Americans (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.58-0.66).

conclusionFemales had lower odds of using AV access than do males for hemodialysis initiation. As compared to whites, blacks and Asians were more likely, and Hispanics were less likely to use AV access for first outpatient hemodialysis. Further investigation of biological and process of care factors may help in developing ways to reduce these disparities.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedArteriovenous Shunt, SurgicalCentral Venous CathetersFemaleHealthcare DisparitiesHumansKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsRenal DialysisRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsUnited StatesDisparitiesGenderHemodialysisMortalityRaceVascular access

Identifiers

PMID29990994
PMCPMC6159828
OpenAlexW2848638131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.