Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29990336›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Clinic-based evaluation study of the diagnostic accuracy of a dual rapid test for the screening of HIV and syphilis in pregnant women in Nigeria.

Ijaodola Olugbenga, Oyelade Taiwo, Maura Laverty, Evelyn Ngige, Chukwuma Anyaike, Rasheed Bakare, Veronica Ogunleye, Brandy L Peterson Maddox, Daniel R Newman, Harriet D Gliddon and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Sexually transmitted infections in pregnant women from sub-Saharan Africa.Southern African journal of infectious diseases · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Ijaodola OlugbengaNational AIDS and STIs Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria, FCT Abuja, Nigeria.
Oyelade TaiwoWHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.ORCID 0000-0002-3452-975X
Maura LavertyDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Evelyn NgigeNational AIDS and STIs Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria, FCT Abuja, Nigeria.
Chukwuma AnyaikeNational AIDS and STIs Control Programme, Federal Ministry of Health Nigeria, FCT Abuja, Nigeria.
Rasheed BakareDepartment of Microbiology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Veronica OgunleyeDepartment of Microbiology, University College Hospital Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Brandy L Peterson MaddoxDivision of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Daniel R NewmanDivision of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9932-8940
Harriet D GliddonDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9623-4252
Eugenia OfonduDermatology and Venereology Department, Federal Medical Center Owerri, Owerri, Nigeria.
Stephen Nurse-FindlayDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9582-9254
Melanie M TaylorDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1786-6295
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention · USFederal Ministry of Health · NGUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan · NGWorld Health Organization · CHLondon Centre for Nanotechnology · GBWorld Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CG

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening pregnant women for HIV and syphilis is recommended by WHO in order to reduce mother-to-child transmission. We evaluated the field performance, feasibility, and acceptability of a dual rapid diagnostic test (RDT) for HIV and syphilis test in antenatal clinic settings in Nigeria. METHODS AND

findingsParticipants were recruited at 12 antenatal clinic sites in three states of Nigeria. All consenting individuals were tested according to the national HIV testing algorithm, as well as a dual RDT, the SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test (Alere, USA), in the clinic. To determine sensitivity, specificity and concordance, whole blood samples were obtained for repeat RDT performance in the laboratory, as well as reference tests for HIV and syphilis. Dual test acceptability and operational characteristics were assessed among participants and clinic staff. The prevalence of HIV among the 4,551 enrollees was 3.0% (138/4551) using the national clinic-based HIV testing algorithm. Positive and negative percent agreement of the HIV component of the dual RDT were 100.0% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.7-100.0) respectively, when compared with the national rapid testing algorithm. The prevalence of syphilis, using TPHA as the reference test, was low at 0.09% (4/4550). The sensitivity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT could not be calculated as no positive results were observed for patients that were positive for syphilis by TPHA. Each of the only four TPHA-positive specimens had RPR titers of 1:1 (neat), indicative of non-active syphilis. The specificity of the syphilis component of the dual RDT was 99.9% (95% CI 99.8-100.0). The dual RDT received favorable feasibility ratings among antenatal care clinic staff. Acceptability among study participants was high with most women reporting preference for rapid dual HIV/syphilis testing.

conclusionsThe SD BIOLINE HIV/Syphilis Duo Test showed a high overall diagnostic accuracy for HIV and a high specificity for syphilis diagnosis in antenatal clinic settings. This study adds to a growing body of evidence that supports the clinic-based use of dual tests for HIV and syphilis among pregnant women.

Indexed as

ImmunoassayAdolescentAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralFemaleHIVHIV InfectionsHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalMass ScreeningNigeriaPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, ViralReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID29990336
PMCPMC6038984
OpenAlexW2836287572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.