ArticlePloS one2018
SeRUN® study: Development of running profiles using a mixed methods analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface Electromyography-Based Motion Analysis of Thigh Muscle Activation During the Modified Star Excursion Balance Test in Novice Recreational Runners with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of Advanced Footwear Technology on Running Economy at Slower Running Speeds: A Randomised, Cross-Over Investigation.Sports medicine - open · 2026Article
- How does it feel to run in minimalist and advanced footwear technology shoes: A qualitative study involving male recreational runners.PloS one · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring contextual factors for management and prevention of running-related injuries: runners and experts' perspectives.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- Definitions and surveillance methods of running-related injuries: A scoping review.European journal of sport science · 2024Article
- The Running Injury Continuum: A qualitative examination of recreational runners' description and management of injury.PloS one · 2023Article
- Differences in training characteristics of recreational endurance runners by race distance - results from the NURMI Study (Step 2).Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Domesticating the condition: Design lessons gained from a marathon on how to cope with barriers imposed by type 1 diabetes.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Going their own way-male recreational runners and running-related injuries: A qualitative thematic analysis.PloS one · 2022Article
- Effect of the Construction of Carbon Fiber Plate Insert to Midsole on Running Performance.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- 'I JUST WANT TO RUN': how recreational runners perceive and deal with injuries.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2021Article
- Article
- Recent Versus Old Previous Injury and Its Association with Running-Related Injuries During Competition by SeRUN® Running Profiles: a Cross-sectional Study.Sports medicine - open · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo determine profiles of urban runners based on socio-demographic, health, motivational, training characteristics and running-related beliefs and behaviours.
methodsMixed, exploratory, sequential study with two stages: 1) quantitative, using an online survey; and 2) qualitative, using semi-structured interviews with runners from the previous stage. Participants were recruited via: running routes commonly attended by runners, eight races, previous databases and social media networks. The survey collected information on six dimensions: (1) socio-demographic; (2) health; (3) motivations; (4) training characteristics; (5) running-related behaviour; and (6) beliefs and perceptions about health. Profiles were identified using a two-step hierarchical clustering analysis. Subsequently, 15 interviews were conducted with participating runners across each of the identified profiles. Qualitative analysis complemented the profiles characterization, explaining motivations to start and continue running, beliefs about risk factors and injury prevention, and the physical therapist's role in rehabilitation. Statistical analysis from stage one was conducted using SPSS 22 with a confidence level of 5%. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic and content analyses.
resultsA total of 821 surveys were analysed (46% female), mean aged 36.6±10.0 years. Cluster analysis delineated four profiles (n = 752) according to years of running experience, weekly running volume and hours of weekly training. Profiles were named "Beginner" (n = 163); "Basic" (n = 164); "Middle" (n = 160) and "Advanced" (n = 265). Profiles were statistically different according to sex, age, years of running experience, training characteristics, previous injuries and use of technological devices (p<0.05). There were identified motivations to start and continue running. Beliefs about risk factors vary among stretching, footwear, training surface and overload. Runners identified the physical therapist as a specialist, involved in the rehabilitation process and showing empathy towards the patient. The identification of these profiles allows the generation of future prospective studies and clinical trials to evaluate risk and prognostic factors targeting specific populations of runners, with the ultimate aim of reducing running-related injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.