ArticleIEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
Bayesian Network Construction and Genotype-Phenotype Inference Using GWAS Statistics.
Article in IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- PROVGEN: A Privacy-Preserving Approach for Outcome Validation in Genomic Research.Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium · 2026Article
- Bayesian dynamic profiling and optimization of important ranked energy from gray level co-occurrence (GLCM) features for empirical analysis of brain MRI.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Application of Bayesian genomic prediction methods to genome-wide association analyses.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2022Review
- Genome-Wide Association Study Statistical Models: A Review.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Review
- STS-BN: An efficient Bayesian network method for detecting causal SNPs.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Using game theory to thwart multistage privacy intrusions when sharing data.Science advances · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have received increasing attention to understand how genetic variation affects different human traits. In this paper, we study whether and to what extent exploiting the GWAS statistics can be used for inferring private information about a human individual. We first provide a method to construct a three-layered Bayesian network explicitly revealing the conditional dependency between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and traits from public GWAS catalog. The key challenge in building a Bayesian network from GWAS statistics is the specification of the conditional probability table of a variable with multiple parent variables. We employ the models of independence of causal influences which assume that the causal mechanism of each parent variable is mutually independent. We then formulate three inference problems based on the dependency relationship captured in the Bayesian network, namely trait inference given SNP genotype, genotype inference given trait, and trait inference given known traits, and develop efficient formulas and algorithms. Different from previous work, the possible target of these inference problems we study may be any individual, not limited to GWAS participants. Empirical evaluations show the effectiveness of our proposed methods. In summary, our work implies that meaningful information can be inferred from modeling GWAS statistics, and appropriate privacy protection mechanisms need to be developed to protect genetic privacy not only of GWAS participants but also regular individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.