Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29989981›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence2018

Ensembles of Lasso Screening Rules.

Seunghak Lee, Nico Gornitz, Eric P Xing, David Heckerman, Christoph Lippert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Fast computation of genome-metagenome interaction effects.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2020
    Article
  16. A Screening Rule forAdvances in neural information processing systems · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Seunghak Lee
Nico Gornitz
Eric P Xing
David Heckerman
Christoph Lippert

Funding

NIDA Center of Excellence OF Computational Drug Abuse Research (CDAR)P30DA035778 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI BAHAR, IVET, XIE, XIANG-QUN · 2014 to 2018
$5.4M
Toward PanOmic and Personalized Association Study of Complex Diseases - A New Statistical and Computational Paradigm for Personalized MedicineR01GM114311 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI WENZEL, SALLY E, WU, WEI · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA035778NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM114311
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In order to solve large-scale lasso problems, screening algorithms have been developed that discard features with zero coefficients based on a computationally efficient screening rule. Most existing screening rules were developed from a spherical constraint and half-space constraints on a dual optimal solution. However, existing rules admit at most two half-space constraints due to the computational cost incurred by the half-spaces, even though additional constraints may be useful to discard more features. In this paper, we present AdaScreen, an adaptive lasso screening rule ensemble, which allows to combine any one sphere with multiple half-space constraints on a dual optimal solution. Thanks to geometrical considerations that lead to a simple closed form solution for AdaScreen, we can incorporate multiple half-space constraints at small computational cost. In our experiments, we show that AdaScreen with multiple half-space constraints simultaneously improves screening performance and speeds up lasso solvers.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningComputer SimulationDatabases, FactualHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID29989981
PMCPMC6925025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.