ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2018
A Comparison of Intention Estimation Methods for Decoder Calibration in Intracortical Brain-Computer Interfaces.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00912041 (BrainGate2), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Tetraplegia
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Speech motor cortex enables BCI cursor control and click.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Trial
- Speech-related dorsal motor cortex activity does not interfere with iBCI cursor control.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Trial
- Closed-loop error damping in human BCI using pre-error motor cortex activity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Speech motor cortex enables BCI cursor control and click.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Brain control of bimanual movement enabled by recurrent neural networks.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Real-time brain-machine interface in non-human primates achieves high-velocity prosthetic finger movements using a shallow feedforward neural network decoder.Nature communications · 2022Article
- The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands.Physiological reviews · 2022Review
- Feel Your Reach: An EEG-Based Framework to Continuously Detect Goal-Directed Movements and Error Processing to Gate Kinesthetic Feedback Informed Artificial Arm Control.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Review
- Principled BCI Decoder Design and Parameter Selection Using a Feedback Control Model.Scientific reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRecent reports indicate that making better assumptions about the user's intended movement can improve the accuracy of decoder calibration for intracortical brain-computer interfaces. Several methods now exist for estimating user intent, including an optimal feedback control model, a piecewise-linear feedback control model, ReFIT, and other heuristics. Which of these methods yields the best decoding performance?
methodsUsing data from the BrainGate2 pilot clinical trial, we measured how a steady-state velocity Kalman filter decoder was affected by the choice of intention estimation method. We examined three separate components of the Kalman filter: dimensionality reduction, temporal smoothing, and output gain (speed scaling).
resultsThe decoder's dimensionality reduction properties were largely unaffected by the intention estimation method. Decoded velocity vectors differed by <5% in terms of angular error and speed vs. target distance curves across methods. In contrast, the smoothing and gain properties of the decoder were greatly affected (> 50% difference in average values). Since the optimal gain and smoothing properties are task-specific (e.g. lower gains are better for smaller targets but worse for larger targets), no one method was better for all tasks.
conclusionOur results show that, when gain and smoothing differences are accounted for, current intention estimation methods yield nearly equivalent decoders and that simple models of user intent, such as a position error vector (target position minus cursor position), perform comparably to more elaborate models. Our results also highlight that simple differences in gain and smoothing properties have a large effect on online performance and can confound decoder comparisons.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.