Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29989258›Full record

SynthesisHealth & social care in the community2019

Towards an ecological understanding of readiness to engage with interventions for children exposed to domestic violence and abuse: Systematic review and qualitative synthesis of perspectives of children, parents and practitioners.

Emma Howarth, Theresa Hm Moore, Nicky Stanley, Harriet L MacMillan, Gene Feder, Alison Shaw

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health & social care in the community, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma HowarthNational Institute of Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Care (CLAHRC) East of England, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Theresa Hm MoorePopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3719-6361
Nicky StanleySchool of Social Work, Care and Community, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7644-1625
Harriet L MacMillanFaculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gene FederNIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Care (CLAHRC) West, Whitefriars, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-3926
Alison ShawPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Lancashire · GB

Funding

Department of Health 11/3007/01Medical Research Council MR/K025643/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children who grow up in homes affected by domestic violence and abuse (DVA) are at risk of poor outcomes across the lifespan, yet there is limited evidence on the acceptability and effectiveness of interventions for them. A recent review of child-focused interventions highlighted a gap in understanding the factors influencing the willingness of parents and children to engage with these programmes. We conducted a systematic review of qualitative evidence on the experiences of receiving and delivering interventions with the aim of identifying factors at different levels of the social-ecological context that may influence parent and child readiness to take up interventions. We searched literature till April 2016 and found 12 reports of eight programmes. Two authors independently screened papers for inclusion, extracted data and identified the first- and second-order constructs. The third-order constructs were derived and fitted to the ecological framework to inform a picture of readiness to engage with interventions. Three key findings emerged from this review: (a) parent and child readiness is influenced by a complex interplay of individual, relationship and organisational factors, highlighting that individual readiness to take up child-focussed interventions must be viewed in an ecological context; (b) the specific process through which women become ready to engage in or facilitate child-focussed interventions may differ from that related to uptake of safety-promoting behaviours and requires parents to be aware of the impact of DVA on children and to focus on children's needs; (c) there are distinct but interlinked processes through which parents and children reach a point of readiness to engage in an interventions aimed at improving child outcomes. We discuss the implications of these findings for both practice and research.

Indexed as

ParentsChildChild AbuseCrime VictimsDomestic ViolenceFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Researchchildrendomestic violenceecological frameworkinterventionqualitative synthesisreadiness

Identifiers

PMID29989258
PMCPMC6392107
OpenAlexW2841784031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.