Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29989086›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

Adoption of paediatric and neonatal pulse oximetry by 12 hospitals in Nigeria: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.

Hamish R Graham, Ayobami A Bakare, Amy Gray, Adejumoke Idowu Ayede, Shamim Qazi, Barbara McPake, Rasa Izadnegahdar, Trevor Duke, Adegoke G Falade

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 51 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Hamish R GrahamCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2461-0463
Ayobami A BakareDepartment of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Amy GrayCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Adejumoke Idowu AyedeDepartment of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Shamim QaziDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Barbara McPakeNossal Institute for Global Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rasa IzadnegahdarBill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Trevor DukeCentre for International Child Health, University of Melbourne, MCRI, The Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Adegoke G FaladeDepartment of Paediatrics, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Royal Children's Hospital · AUUniversity of Ibadan · NGGates Foundation · USThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity College Hospital, Ibadan · NGWorld Health Organization · CH

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPulse oximetry is a life-saving tool for identifying children with hypoxaemia and guiding oxygen therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the adoption of oximetry practices in 12 Nigerian hospitals and identify strategies to improve adoption.

methodsWe conducted a mixed-methods realist evaluation to understand how oximetry was adopted in 12 Nigerian hospitals and why it varied in different contexts. We collected quantitative data on oximetry use (from case notes) and user knowledge (pretraining/post-training tests). We collected qualitative data via focus groups with project nurses (n=12) and interviews with hospital staff (n=11). We used the quantitative data to describe the uptake of oximetry practices. We used mixed methods to explain how hospitals adopted oximetry and why it varied between contexts.

resultsBetween January 2014 and April 2017, 38 525 children (38% aged ≤28 days) were admitted to participating hospitals (23 401 pretraining; 15 124 post-training). Prior to our intervention, 3.3% of children and 2.5% of neonates had oximetry documented on admission. In the 18 months of intervention period, all hospitals improved oximetry practices, typically achieving oximetry coverage on >50% of admitted children after 2-3 months and >90% after 6-12 months. However, oximetry adoption varied in different contexts. We identified key mechanisms that influenced oximetry adoption in particular contexts.

conclusionPulse oximetry is a simple, life-saving clinical practice, but introducing it into routine clinical practice is challenging. By exploring how oximetry was adopted in different contexts, we identified strategies to enhance institutional adoption of oximetry, which will be relevant for scale-up of oximetry in hospitals globally. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617000341325.

Indexed as

child healthintervention studyother diagnostic or toolpneumoniaqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID29989086
PMCPMC6035503
OpenAlexW2810993656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.