Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29989085›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of biological sciences2018

HBPred: a tool to identify growth hormone-binding proteins.

Hua Tang, Ya-Wei Zhao, Ping Zou, Chun-Mei Zhang, Rong Chen, Po Huang, Hao Lin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
12.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 183 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hua TangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Ya-Wei ZhaoKey Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.
Ping ZouDepartment of Pathophysiology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Chun-Mei ZhangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Rong ChenDepartment of Pathophysiology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Po HuangDepartment of Pathophysiology, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou 646000, China.
Hao LinKey Laboratory for NeuroInformation of Ministry of Education, Center for Informational Biology, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 610054, China.
Southwest Medical University · CNUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hormone-binding protein (HBP) is a kind of soluble carrier protein and can selectively and non-covalently interact with hormone. HBP plays an important role in life growth, but its function is still unclear. Correct recognition of HBPs is the first step to further study their function and understand their biological process. However, it is difficult to correctly recognize HBPs from more and more proteins through traditional biochemical experiments because of high experimental cost and long experimental period. To overcome these disadvantages, we designed a computational method for identifying HBPs accurately in the study. At first, we collected HBP data from UniProt to establish a high-quality benchmark dataset. Based on the dataset, the dipeptide composition was extracted from HBP residue sequences. In order to find out the optimal features to provide key clues for HBP identification, the analysis of various (ANOVA) was performed for feature ranking. The optimal features were selected through the incremental feature selection strategy. Subsequently, the features were inputted into support vector machine (SVM) for prediction model construction. Jackknife cross-validation results showed that 88.6% HBPs and 81.3% non-HBPs were correctly recognized, suggesting that our proposed model was powerful. This study provides a new strategy to identify HBPs. Moreover, based on the proposed model, we established a webserver called

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCarrier ProteinsComputational BiologyDipeptidesHumansSupport Vector MachineBiomarkersCarrier ProteinsDipeptidessomatotropin-binding proteinBenchmark datasetDipeptide compositionFeature selectionHormone-binding proteinWebserver

Identifiers

PMID29989085
PMCPMC6036759
OpenAlexW2805110914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.