Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29989037›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2018

The impact of introduction of Code-STEMI program on the reduction of door-to-balloon time in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A single-center study in Saudi Arabia.

Abdulmalik Abdullah Alyahya, Mohammed Abdullah Alghammass, Fahad Saleh Aldhahri, Abdullah Abdulaziz Alsebti, Abdullah Yousef Alfulaij, Saleh Hamad Alrashed, Husam Al Faleh, Mostafa Alshameri, Khalid Alhabib, Mohammed Arafah and 4 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdulmalik Abdullah AlyahyaCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed Abdullah AlghammassCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Fahad Saleh AldhahriCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Abdulaziz AlsebtiCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Yousef AlfulaijCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Saleh Hamad AlrashedCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Husam Al FalehCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mostafa AlshameriCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid AlhabibCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Mohammed ArafahCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abduellah MoberikCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Abdulaziz AlmulaikCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Zuhair Al-AseriCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Tarek Seifaw KashourCollege of Medicine, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Saud University · SAKing Khalid University Hospital · SA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study was conducted to evaluate the effect of direct emergency department activation of the catheterization lab on door-to-balloon time (D2BT) and outcomes of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients at a major tertiary care hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

methodsThis was a retrospective cohort study that enrolled 100 consecutive patients with acute STEMI who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention between June 2010 and January 2015. The patients were divided into two groups of 50 patients each. The first group was treated prior to establishing the Code-STEMI protocol. The other group was treated according to the protocol, which was implemented in June 2013. The Code-STEMI protocol is a comprehensive program implementing direct activation of the catheterization lab team using a single call system, data monitoring and feedback, and standardized order forms.

resultsThe mean age for both groups was 54 ± 12 years. Males represented 86% (43) and 94% (47) of the patients in the two groups, respectively. In both groups, 90% (90) of patients had one or more comorbidities. The Code-STEMI group had a significantly lower D2BT, with 70% of patients treated within the recommended 90 minutes (median, 76.5 minutes; interquartile range, 63-90 minutes). By contrast, only 26% of pre-Code-STEMI patients were treated within this timeframe (median, 107 minutes; interquartile range, 74-149 minutes). In-hospital complications were lower in the Code-STEMI group; however, the only statistically significant reduction was in non-fatal re-infarction (8% vs. 0%,

conclusionImplementation of direct emergency department catheterization lab activation protocol was associated with a significant reduction in D2BT.

Indexed as

Door-to-balloonPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID29989037
PMCPMC6035382
OpenAlexW2770673191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.