ReviewWorld journal of transplantation2018
Utility of central venous pressure measurement in renal transplantation: Is it evidence based?
Review in World journal of transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03846869 (Major Cations Targeted Fluid Therapy In Renal Transplantation.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Major Cations Targeted Fluid Therapy In Renal Transplantation.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perioperative fluid management in kidney transplantation: What's new and future directives?World journal of nephrology · 2026Review
- A comparative study of pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing kidney transplantation.Singapore medical journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Influence of Intraoperative Hemodynamic Parameters on Outcome in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- To compare intraoperative goal directed fluid therapy by trans-oesophageal Doppler vis-à-vis FloTrac™ in patients undergoing living related renal transplantation-a prospective randomised controlled study.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2020Article
- Cardiac output-guided hemodynamic therapy for adult living donor kidney transplantation in children under 20 kg: A pilot study.Paediatric anaesthesia · 2019Article
- A randomized comparison between pulse pressure variation and central venous pressure in patients undergoing renal transplantation.Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacologyArticle
- Crystalloid fluids and delayed graft function in kidney transplant: A cohort study.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adequate intravenous fluid therapy is essential in renal transplant recipients to ensure a good allograft perfusion. Central venous pressure (CVP) has been considered the cornerstone to guide the fluid therapy for decades; it was the only available simple tool worldwide. However, the revolutionary advances in assessing the dynamic preload variables together with the availability of new equipment to precisely measure the effect of intravenous fluids on the cardiac output had created a question mark on the future role of CVP. Despite the critical role of fluid therapy in the field of transplantation. There are only a few clinical studies that compared the CVP guided fluid therapy with the other modern techniques and their relation to the outcome in renal transplantation. Our work sheds some light on the available published data in renal transplantation, together with data from other disciplines evaluating the utility of central venous pressure measurement. Although lager well-designed studies are still required to consolidate the role of new techniques in the field of renal transplantation, we can confidently declare that the new techniques have the advantages of providing more accurate haemodynamic assessment, which results in a better patient outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.