ArticleJournal of current ophthalmology2018
Treatment outcomes of post cataract surgery endophthalmitis in a tertiary referral center in Iran.
Article in Journal of current ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The association between treatment method, microbiological findings, and visual acuity in endophthalmitis patients: A retrospective, multi-centred study.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Analysis of the effect of infection control strategy in preventing and controlling infectious endophthalmitis after cataract surgery.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Early Vitrectomy for Endophthalmitis: Are EVS Guidelines Still Valid?Ophthalmic research · 2023Review
- Atypical Microbiological Feature of Infectious Endophthalmitis on Jeju Island: A 10-Year Study at a Single Tertiary Referral Center.Journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery in the United States: A Report from the Intelligent Research in Sight Registry, 2013-2017.Ophthalmology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients with post cataract surgery endophthalmitis in our tertiary referral center.
methodsIn this prospective study, patients with presumed post cataract surgery endophthalmitis were treated based on the modified endophthalmitis vitrectomy study (EVS) guidelines and followed for at least three months. Visual and anatomical outcomes were assessed in the last follow-up visit.
resultsA total of 46 eyes with presumed post cataract surgery endophthalmitis were admitted to our hospital, of which 3 eyes with initial visual acuity of no light perception (NLP) and severe inflammation underwent primary evisceration. Forty-three patients were included to this study and followed up for at least three months. Culture results were positive in 51.2% of cases and streptococcus viridans was the most frequent isolated organism. Pars plana vitrectomy was performed in 16 eyes as primary treatment, and intravitreal antibiotic injection was done in 27 eyes. Re-treatment with pars plana vitrectomy was required in 15 eyes (34.9%). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at final visit was 20/40 or better in 12 eyes (27.9%), between 20/200 to 20/40 in 17 eyes (39.5%), and worse than 20/200 in 14 eyes (32.6%). Evisceration was done in one eye (2.3%), and retinal detachment happened in 4 eyes (9.3%).
conclusionsThe visual outcomes of post cataract surgery endophthalmitis are generally poor. Our results in this study were comparable with many previous studies from other referral centers, however, unlike many reports, streptococcus viridans was the most common isolate in our study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.