Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988838›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2018

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Branch Retinal Artery Occlusion.

Tuna Çelik, Feyza Bilen, Fatime Nilüfer Yalçındağ, Huban Atilla

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Retinal Artery Occlusion: A Review of Current Management Practices.Journal of ophthalmic & vision research · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tuna ÇelikAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2383-0029
Feyza BilenAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2002-0503
Fatime Nilüfer YalçındağAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5142-6912
Huban AtillaAnkara University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-3317
Ankara University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) is a non-invasive alternative method used in the diagnosis and follow-up of acute branch retinal artery occlusion to show changes secondary to ischemia. We report a case with acute branch retinal artery occlusion. A 52-year-old man presented with a complaint of sudden-onset visual loss in the right lower quadrant of the left eye for the previous three days. Best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 temporally. Inferonasal visual field deficit was detected with confrontation. Pupillary light reactions were normal in both eyes and there was no relative afferent pupillary defect. Dilated fundus examination revealed retinal lesion suggesting superior temporal branch retinal artery occlusion. He was treated with dextran 40 and pentoxifylline. Follow-up fundus fluorescein angiography could not performed because of chronic renal failure; OCTA demonstrated superficial and deep capillary non-perfusion areas and telangiectases in areas corresponding to the artery occlusion.

Indexed as

Acute vision lossbranch retinal artery occlusionoptical coherence tomography angiographyretinal artery occlusion

Identifiers

PMID29988838
PMCPMC6032954
OpenAlexW2811147684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.