Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988827›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of ophthalmology2018

Validity and Reliability of the Glaucoma Knowledge Level Questionnaire.

Zeynep Demirtaş, Gökçe Dağtekin, Muhammed Fatih Önsüz, Aziz Soysal, Nilgün Yıldırım, Selma Metintaş

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zeynep DemirtaşEskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0403-7199
Gökçe DağtekinEskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6424-2434
Muhammed Fatih ÖnsüzEskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7234-3385
Aziz SoysalEskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6557-5441
Nilgün YıldırımEskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8198-2605
Selma MetintaşEskişehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health, Eskişehir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5002-5041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe present study was conducted to develop an instrument for measuring adults' glaucoma knowledge levels and to establish the instrument's validity and reliability. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study group consisted of 811 persons aged 40-80 years who presented to primary health care institutions and did not have a glaucoma diagnosis. A 27-item questionnaire measuring level of glaucoma knowledge was created by the study team. Following expert consultation, it was structurally evaluated. The difficulty index and discrimination index were calculated for each item. Factor analysis was used to determine construct validity, Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient and item-total correlations were calculated to determine reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess the extent to which the factor structure of the scale fit. We analysed correlation with the National Eye Health Education Program (NEHEP) Eye-Q scale in order to evaluate the validity of the scale.

resultsThe final glaucoma knowledge level questionnaire comprised 10 items in one dimension. The discrimination index and difficulty index ranged between 0.28 to 0.65 and 33 to 61%, respectively. According to factor analysis, the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin score was 0.760 and Bartlett's test indicated p<0.001. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable scale fit and fit indices. Validity assessment revealed a positive correlation between the total score of the items of the NEHEP scale and glaucoma knowledge level questionnaire score (r=0.522; p<0.001). Scores were higher in participants who were aged 40-64, living in the city, had education level of high school or above and had previous eye examination or intraocular pressure measurement.

conclusionThe glaucoma knowledge level questionnaire has the distinction of being the first valid and reliable scale for assessing level of glaucoma knowledge in Turkey.

Indexed as

Glaucomalevel of knowledgescale development

Identifiers

PMID29988827
PMCPMC6032956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.