Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988746›Full record

ArticleJournal of pain research2018

Comparison of ozone and lidocaine injection efficacy vs dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome patients.

Seyed Ahmad Raeissadat, Seyed Mansoor Rayegani, Fatemeh Sadeghi, Shahram Rahimi-Dehgolan

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pain research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04704297 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Trigger Point Injection for Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Low Back (T-PIMPS): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorMadigan Army Medical CenterRan2020 to 2022Enrolled180ConditionsLow Back Pain, Myofascial Pain Syndrome Lower BackArmsTreatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the low back. This intervention will be based on outcomes of the medications listed below., Evaluation of functional ability using a patient centered functional score known as the Modified Oswestry Disability Index (MODI). The intervention will be based on outcomes of medications below., Following up with participants 60-72 hours after treatment in the Emergency Department. This intervention will be based on outcomes of the medications listed below.
NCT05668728 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Comparison for 3 Different Dry Needling Techniques for Myofacial Pain Syndrome Causing Servical Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorSultan Abdulhamid Han Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, TurkeyRan2023 to 2023Enrolled45ConditionsMyofascial Pain Syndromes, Neck PainArmsGroup 1: Peppering, group 2: spin and wait, group 3: Peppering and spin and wait
NCT06018675 completednot on this map

Comparison of Kinesio Taping, Dry Needling and Lidocain Injection Methods in Myofascial Pain Syndrome

TypeobservationalSponsorBursa City HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled66ConditionsMyofascial Pain SyndromeArmskinesiotherapy
NCT07053176 phase4enrolling by invitationnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Usefullnes of Local Lidocaine Paravertebral Cervical Injection on Cervicogenic Dizziness Symptoms Management: a Randomzied Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniter OnlusRan2025 to 2025Enrolled42ConditionsCervicogenic DizzinessArms0.5% Lidocaine, Saline Solution (NaCl 0,9%)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Oxygen-Ozone Therapy of Musculoskeletal Neck Pain: A Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Detection of chlorite, chlorate and perchlorate in ozonated saline.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seyed Ahmad RaeissadatClinical Development Research Center of Shahid Modarres Hospital, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Mansoor RayeganiPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shohada-e-Tajrish Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Fatemeh SadeghiPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, shahram.rahimi.dehgolan@gmail.com.
Shahram Rahimi-DehgolanPhysical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, shahram.rahimi.dehgolan@gmail.com.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMyofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is a common musculoskeletal disorder among young adults associated with presence of myofascial trigger points. We aimed to evaluate efficacy of ozone injection (OI) in MPS patients, compared with two currently used methods including lidocaine injection (LI) and dry needling (DN). PATIENTS AND

methodsIn this single-blinded study, a total of 72 eligible patients were included and then randomly divided into three equal groups: DN, OI, and LI. All patients received treatment in three weekly sessions. Visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, cervical lateral flexion, pain pressure threshold (PPT), and neck disability index (NDI) were the main outcome measures, which were evaluated at baseline and at 4 weeks after injections. Analytic results were demonstrated as both within- and between-groups mean difference (MD).

resultsSixty two patients finished the study, 20 participants in both the DN and LI groups, and 22 persons in OI group. Distribution of all demographics and baseline clinical variables were relatively similar among groups. All three interventions were remarkably effective in improving patients' pain and PPT. Significant decrease in VAS (MD=-3.6±1.4) and increase in PPT (MD=7.2±5.1) within 4 weeks follow-up confirmed this finding. Also, NDI had similar significant improvement (MD=-9.9±8.7), but lateral flexion range did not show remarkable increase. There was also a statistically significant difference among three methods' efficacy on VAS, NDI, and PPT, favoring OI and LI.

conclusionIn summary, this data showed that in short-term follow-up, all three methods were significantly effective in MPS treatment; however, OI and LI groups had slightly better results than the DN group, with no remarkable preference between them.

Indexed as

intra-muscular ozone injectionmyofascial trigger pointswet needling

Identifiers

PMID29988746
PMCPMC6029589
OpenAlexW2809748799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.