Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988684›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2018

A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA.

Igor Brikun, Deborah Nusskern, Andrew Decatus, Eric Harvey, Lin Li, Diha Freije

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Igor BrikunEuclid Diagnostics LLC, 9800 Connecticut Dr., Crown Point, IN 46307 USA.
Deborah NusskernEuclid Diagnostics LLC, 9800 Connecticut Dr., Crown Point, IN 46307 USA.
Andrew DecatusBioStat Solutions Inc., 5280 Corporate Dr., Suite C200, Frederick, MD 21703 USA.
Eric Harvey3Health Decisions Inc., 2510 Meridian Parkway, Durham, NC 27713 USA.
Lin LiBioStat Solutions Inc., 5280 Corporate Dr., Suite C200, Frederick, MD 21703 USA.
Diha FreijeEuclid Diagnostics LLC, 9800 Connecticut Dr., Crown Point, IN 46307 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5158-7943

Funding

A diagnostic test for the detection of prostate cancer from urine DNAR43CA165444 · NCI · EUCLID DIAGNOSTICS, LLC · PI FREIJE, DIHA J · 2013 to 2013
$288k
NCI NIH HHS R43 CA165444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early screening for prostate cancer (PCA) remains controversial because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant cancers. Even though a number of diagnostic tests have been developed to improve on PSA testing, there remains a need for a more informative non-invasive test for PCA. The objective of this study is to identify a panel of DNA methylation markers suitable for a non-invasive diagnostic test from urine DNA collected following a digital rectal exam (DRE) and/or from first morning void (FV). A secondary objective is to determine if the cumulative methylation is indicative of biopsy findings. Methods: DRE and FV urine samples were prospectively collected from 94 patients and analyzed using 24 methylation-specific quantitative PCR assays derived from 19 CpG islands. The methylation of individual markers and various combinations of markers was compared to biopsy results. A methylation threshold for cancer classification was determined using a target specificity of 70%. The average methylation and the number of positive markers were also compared to the result of the biopsy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated. Results: Methylation of all 19 markers was detected in FV and DRE DNAs. Combining the methylation of two or more markers improved on individual marker results. Using Conclusions: PCA-specific methylation was detected in both FV and DRE DNA. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy at the 6of19 threshold between DRE and FV urine DNA. The results support the development of a non-invasive diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with elevated PSA. The test can also provide patients with personalized recommendations based on their own methylation profile.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBiomarkers, TumorDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDigital Rectal ExaminationHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorProstate-Specific AntigenCirculating DNADNA methylationLiquid biopsyProstate cancerUrine biomarker

Identifiers

PMID29988684
PMCPMC6029393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.