ArticleClinical epigenetics2018
A panel of DNA methylation markers for the detection of prostate cancer from FV and DRE urine DNA.
Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Radiomic and Genomic Machine Learning Method Performance for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Systematic Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Pooled it
- Development and validation of a two-gene urine DNA methylation assay for noninvasive prostate cancer detection: a prospective multicenter study.Molecular biomedicine · 2026Article
- Integrating DNA methylation and clinical features to predict prostate cancer prognosis.BMC cancer · 2026Article
- Article
- A Highly Sensitive Methylation Assay for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis.The world journal of men's health · 2026Article
- The Years 2015-2025 as a Prospective Decade for the Identification of Specific Methylation Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Prostate Cancer: A Dual Perspective on Early Detection and Advanced Disease Management.Cancers · 2025Review
- Clinical significance of urine-based automated detection of GSTP1 methylation for the diagnosis of suspected prostate cancer patients.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- PCaseek: ultraspecific urinary tumor DNA detection using deep learning for prostate cancer diagnosis and Gleason grading.Cell discovery · 2024Article
- Circulating Tumor DNA in Genitourinary Cancers: Detection, Prognostics, and Therapeutic Implications.Cancers · 2024Review
- Promoter hypermethylation of Y-chromosome geneEpigenomics · 2024Article
- Clinical Biofluid Assays for Prostate Cancer.Cancers · 2023Review
- Cell-free DNA in the management of prostate cancer: Current status and future prospective.Asian journal of urology · 2023Review
- Diagnostic Efficiency of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value to Predict Prostate Cancer in Patients with Prostate-Specific Antigen between 4 and 20 ng/mL.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Liquid Biopsy in Diagnosis and Prognosis of Non-Metastatic Prostate Cancer.Biomedicines · 2022Review
- Review
- Beyond liquid biopsy: Toward non-invasive assays for distanced cancer diagnostics in pandemics.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2022Review
- Article
- Establishment of a Novel Combined Nomogram for Predicting the Risk of Progression Related to Castration Resistance in Patients With Prostate Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Clinical Relevance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Prostate Cancer Management.Biomedicines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early screening for prostate cancer (PCA) remains controversial because of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of clinically insignificant cancers. Even though a number of diagnostic tests have been developed to improve on PSA testing, there remains a need for a more informative non-invasive test for PCA. The objective of this study is to identify a panel of DNA methylation markers suitable for a non-invasive diagnostic test from urine DNA collected following a digital rectal exam (DRE) and/or from first morning void (FV). A secondary objective is to determine if the cumulative methylation is indicative of biopsy findings. Methods: DRE and FV urine samples were prospectively collected from 94 patients and analyzed using 24 methylation-specific quantitative PCR assays derived from 19 CpG islands. The methylation of individual markers and various combinations of markers was compared to biopsy results. A methylation threshold for cancer classification was determined using a target specificity of 70%. The average methylation and the number of positive markers were also compared to the result of the biopsy, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated. Results: Methylation of all 19 markers was detected in FV and DRE DNAs. Combining the methylation of two or more markers improved on individual marker results. Using Conclusions: PCA-specific methylation was detected in both FV and DRE DNA. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy at the 6of19 threshold between DRE and FV urine DNA. The results support the development of a non-invasive diagnostic test to reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with elevated PSA. The test can also provide patients with personalized recommendations based on their own methylation profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.