ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2018
Influence of Sitting Positions and Level of Trunk Control During Reaching Movements in Late Preterm and Full-Term Infants.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Segmental Trunk Control in Sitting Between Full-Term and Preterm Infants Raised in the Orphanage Setting.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- The Key Aspects of Neonatal and Infant Neurological Examination: The Ballard Score, the Infant's Head with Hydrocephalus and Assessment in a Clinical Setting.The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS · 2023Article
- The influence between gestational age and postural control, a systematic review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Factors Associating with the Segmental Postural Control during Sitting in Moderate-to-Late Preterm Infants via Longitudinal Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control in Moderate-to-Late Preterm Infants Related to Sitting Development.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Relationship between segmental trunk control and gross motor development in typically developing infants aged from 4 to 12 months: a pilot study.BMC pediatrics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to acquire reaching and independent sitting, refinement of trunk control is needed by gradually and progressively incorporating the head, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral segments. Previous studies have evaluated trunk control in a segmental way, standardizing the level of manual support in the infants' trunk during reaching. The aim of this study was to identify the level of trunk control and to analyze the influence of the difference sitting positions in late preterm and full-term infants between 6 and 8 months of age during reaching. Therefore, 36 infants born full term (control group)-FTG and 20 late preterm infants at a corrected age (experimental group)-PTG were evaluated. Most of the infants started the study at 6 months and they were evaluated monthly until 8 months of age (longitudinal study) in a total of 1-3 visits. The Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control was used to identify the level of trunk control in a segmental way, as well as to verify the capacity of the infant to maintain or regain the vertical position while sitting. Kinematic analysis was used for reaching. The infants were in a ring sitting position and at 90° of flexion. To elicit reaching, an attractive object was presented at the infant's midline and at 45° to the right and left. We found that PTG infants presented lower trunk control scores, i.e., worse control. For both groups, the ring sitting position and at 90° of flexion did not influence most kinematic variables during reaching because accurate manual support was provided for the infants' trunk. The PTG group presented less trunk displacement when at 90° of flexion. Compared to the FTG, even with accurate trunk support, the PTG group presented more immature reaches. These results suggest that accurate manual trunk support favored more stability of the trunk during the reach. Thus, early intervention is suggested for PTG infants and reaching in this age group should be trained in the ring sitting position with their trunk accurately manually supported. SATCo is an effective tool for segmental trunk evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.