ArticleFEBS open bio2018
Efficient CRISPR-based genome editing using tandem guide RNAs and editable surrogate reporters.
Article in FEBS open bio, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Generation of Leucine-Rich Repeat Kinase 2 (LRRK2) Knockout Neuroblastoma Cells SH-SY5Y by CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing.Biochemical genetics · 2026Article
- Recent advances of genome editing and related technologies in China.Gene therapy · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cleavage efficiency plays a key role in clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-based gene editing, particularly when the given guide RNA exhibits low cleavage activity. Here, we describe the packaging of tandem guide RNAs and single-strand annealing-based surrogate reporter cassettes into the CRISPR/CRISPR-associated protein 9 vector, which increased gene-editing efficiency by 4.94-6.31-fold and simultaneously enriched the proportion of genetically modified cells. This strategy may substantially improve genome-editing efficiency for demanding applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.