ArticleFrontiers in plant science2018
Signatures of Selection in the Genomes of Chinese Chestnut (
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptome analysis of differential sugar accumulation in the developing embryo of contrasting twoFrontiers in plant science · 2023Article
- Genetic Diversity and Population Structure of Chinese Chestnut (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Domestication and selection footprints in Persian walnuts (Juglans regia).PLoS genetics · 2022Article
- Pan-genome analysis of three main Chinese chestnut varieties.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Transcriptome analysis of genes involved in starch biosynthesis in developing Chinese chestnut (Castanea mollissima Blume) seed kernels.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Effects of GABA and Vigabatrin on the Germination of Chinese Chestnut Recalcitrant Seeds and Its Implications for Seed Dormancy and Storage.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Morpho-Physiological and Genomic Evaluation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Comparing Pool-seq, Rapture, and GBS genotyping for inferring weak population structure: The American lobster (Ecology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chestnuts (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.