Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988504›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2018

Detection of Pulmonary Infectious Pathogens From Lung Biopsy Tissues by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing.

Henan Li, Hua Gao, Han Meng, Qi Wang, Shuguang Li, Hongbin Chen, Yongjun Li, Hui Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 162 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Advances in pathogen detection ofInfectious medicine · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Henan LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hua GaoDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Han MengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qi WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shuguang LiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hongbin ChenDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yongjun LiBGI Genomics, Beijing Genomics Institute-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, China.
Hui WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is a comprehensive approach for sequence-based identification of pathogenic microbes. However, reports on the use of mNGS in pulmonary infection applied to lung biopsy tissues remain scarce. In this study, we applied mNGS to detect the presence of pathogenic microbes in lung biopsy tissues from 20 patients with pulmonary disorders indicating possible infection. We applied a new data management for identifying pathogen species based on mNGS data. We determined the thresholds for the unique reads and relative abundance required to identify the infectious pathogens. Potential pathogens of pulmonary infections in 15 patients were identified by mNGS. The comparison between mNGS and culture method resulted that the sensitivity and specificity were 100.0% (95% CI: 31.0-100.0%) and 76.5% (95% CI: 49.8-92.2%) for bacteria, 57.1% (95% CI: 20.2-88.2%) and 61.5% (95% CI: 32.2-84.9%) for fungi. The positive predictive value (PPV) (42.9% for bacteria, 44.4% for fungi) was much lower than negative predictive value (NPV) (100% for bacteria, 72.7% for fungi) in mNGS vs. culture method. The mNGS showed the highest specificity (100.0 and 94.1%) and PPV (100.0 and 75.0%) in the evaluation of fungi and MTBC respectively, when compared with histopathology method. The study indicated that mNGS of lung biopsy tissues can be used to detect the presence (or absence) of pulmonary pathogens in patients, with potential benefits in speed and sensitivity. However, accurate data management and interpretation of mNGS are required, and should be combined with observations of clinical manifestations and conventional laboratory-based diagnostic methods.

Indexed as

BiopsyAdolescentAdultAgedBacteriaChildChinaFemaleFungiHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLungLung Diseases, FungalMaleMetagenomicsMiddle Agedclinical diagnosisdata managementlung biopsy tissuesmetagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS)pulmonary infection

Identifiers

PMID29988504
PMCPMC6026637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.