ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2018
Evaluation of the Impact of Genetically Modified Cotton After 20 Years of Cultivation in Mexico.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- GhGLDH35A gene-mediated ROS homeostasis and stomatal movement via the ascorbic acid pathway confers alkaline stress tolerance.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Verticillium Wilt of Cotton: Identification and Detection of the Causal Pathogen and Its Control.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Can the molecular and transgenic breeding of crops be an alternative and sustainable technology to meet food demand?Functional & integrative genomics · 2025Review
- Latin America: a hub for agrobiotechnological innovations.Annals of botany · 2025Review
- Article
- Effects of N application methods on cotton yield and fertilizer N recovery efficiency in salinity fields with drip irrigation under mulch film usingFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
- Article
- Sustainable access of quality seeds of genetically engineered crops in Eastern Africa - Case study of Bt Cotton.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- Biotechnology and Solutions: Insect-Pest-Resistance Management for Improvement and Development of Bt Cotton (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Review
- Regulatory roles of noncoding RNAs in callus induction and plant cell dedifferentiation.Plant cell reports · 2023Review
- Economic surplus implications of Mexico's decision to phaseout genetically modified maize imports.GM crops & food · 2022Article
- Transgenic Improvement for Biotic Resistance of Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
- Three strategies of transgenic manipulation for crop improvement.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Review
- Transformation and evaluation of Broad-Spectrum insect and weedicide resistant genes in Gossypium arboreum (Desi Cotton).GM crops & food · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For more than 20 years cotton has been the most widely sown genetically modified (GM) crop in Mexico. Its cultivation has fulfilled all requirements and has gone through the different regulatory stages. During the last 20 years, both research-institutions and biotech-companies have generated scientific and technical information regarding GM cotton cultivation in Mexico. In this work, we collected data in order to analyze the environmental and agronomic effects of the use of GM cotton in Mexico. In 1996, the introduction of Bt cotton made it possible to reactivate this crop, which in previous years was greatly reduced due to pest problems, production costs and environmental concerns. Bt cotton is a widely accepted tool for cotton producers and has proven to be efficient for the control of lepidopteran pests. The economic benefits of its use are variable, and depend on factors such as the international cotton-prices and other costs associated with its inputs. So far, the management strategies used to prevent development of insect resistance to GM cotton has been successful, and there are no reports of insect resistance development to Bt cotton in Mexico. In addition, no effects have been observed on non-target organisms. For herbicide tolerant cotton, the prevention of herbicide resistance has also been successful since unlike other countries, the onset of resistance weeds is still slow, apparently due to cultural practices and rotation of different herbicides. Environmental benefits have been achieved with a reduction in chemical insecticide applications and the subsequent decrease in primary pest populations, so that the inclusion of other technologies-e.g., use of non-Bt cotton- can be explored. Nevertheless, control measures need to be implemented during transport of the bolls and fiber to prevent dispersal of volunteer plants and subsequent gene flow to wild relatives distributed outside the GM cotton growing areas. It is still necessary to implement national research programs, so that biotechnology and plant breeding advances can be used in the development of cotton varieties adapted to the Mexican particular environmental conditions and to control insect pests of regional importance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.