Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988313›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2018

Cardiovascular diseases monitoring: lessons from population-based registries to address future opportunities and challenges in Europe.

Luigi Palmieri, Giovanni Veronesi, Giovanni Corrao, Giuseppe Traversa, Marco M Ferrario, Giovanni Nicoletti, Anna Di Lonardo, Chiara Donfrancesco, Flavia Carle, Simona Giampaoli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luigi Palmieri1Department of Cardiovascular, Dysmetabolic and Aging-associated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Via Giano della Bella, 34 00162 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-2642
Giovanni Veronesi2Research Centre in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Università dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Giovanni Corrao3Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, Università di Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Traversa4National Centre for Drug Research and Evaluation, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Rome, Italy.
Marco M Ferrario2Research Centre in Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Università dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy.
Giovanni Nicoletti5Ministry of Health, Rome, Italy.
Anna Di Lonardo1Department of Cardiovascular, Dysmetabolic and Aging-associated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Via Giano della Bella, 34 00162 Rome, Italy.
Chiara Donfrancesco1Department of Cardiovascular, Dysmetabolic and Aging-associated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Via Giano della Bella, 34 00162 Rome, Italy.
Flavia Carle6Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.
Simona Giampaoli1Department of Cardiovascular, Dysmetabolic and Aging-associated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), Via Giano della Bella, 34 00162 Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPopulation-based registries implement the comprehensive collection of all disease events that occur in a well-characterized population within a certain time period and represent the preferred tools for disease monitoring at a population level. Main characteristics of a Population-based registry are to provide answers to defined research questions, also related to clinical and health policy purposes, assuring completeness of event identification, and implementing a process of case adjudication (validation) according to standardised diagnostic criteria.

methodsThe application of a standard methodology results in the availability of reliable and comparable data and facilitates the transferability of health information for research and evidence-based health policies. Although registries are extremely useful, they require considerable resources to be implemented and maintained, high cost and efforts, to produce stable and reliable indicators.

resultsThanks to available health information and information technology, current administrative databases on hospital admissions and discharges, medication use, in-patient care utilization, surgical operations, drug dispensations, ticket exemption and invasive procedures are increasingly available. They represent basic sources of information for implementing Population-based registries.Main strengths and limitations of Population-based registries are described taking into consideration the example of cardiovascular diseases, as well as future challenges and opportunities for implementing Population-based registries at European level.

conclusionsThe integration of population-based registries and current administrative health databases may help to complete the picture of the disease rebuilding the evolution of the disease as a continuum from the onset to the possible consequent complications.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseasesCurrent administrative health databasesPopulation-based registriesRecord linkageTime trends

Identifiers

PMID29988313
PMCPMC6022302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.