Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988192›Full record

ArticleParasite epidemiology and control2016

Evaluation of recombinant K39 antigen and various promastigote antigens in sero-diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis in Bangladesh.

Sultana Shahana Banu, Be-Nazir Ahmed, Abul Khair Mohammad Shamsuzzaman, Rogan Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasite epidemiology and control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Cloning of K26 Hydrophilic Antigen from Iranian Strain ofIranian journal of public health · 2017
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. The rK39 Antigen from an Iranian Strain ofIranian journal of parasitology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sultana Shahana BanuParasitology Department, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (CIDM), ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Be-Nazir AhmedDirectorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abul Khair Mohammad ShamsuzzamanDirectorate General of Health Services (DGHS), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Rogan LeeParasitology Department, Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology (CIDM), ICPMR, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Directorate General of Health Services · BDThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDefinitive diagnosis of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) by demonstrating parasites in tissue smears or by culture involves invasive procedures, technical expertise and adequate laboratory facilities. Endemic countries rely mainly on serological tests to diagnose VL. Currently, the immunochromatographic test incorporating the recombinant K39 antigen (rK39 ICT) is the reference test for rapid diagnosis of VL in the Indian subcontinent. The performance of serological tests using rK39 and other promastigote antigens can vary due to differences in antigen expression, the various hosts and environmental factors. To achieve elimination of VL, diagnostic accuracy will be necessary for active case detection especially in those who carry asymptomatic infections. We evaluated the performance of rK39 ICT, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay using mixed

methodsThe sensitivity of each serological test was evaluated on 155 patients who were diagnosed to have VL by microscopy and/or by culture methods. Test specificities were calculated on 706 healthy blood donors, 91 diagnostic sera from patients with a febrile illness and sera from patients positive for malaria (n = 91) and Chagas disease (n = 91). All statistical calculations were at 95% confidence intervals.

resultsThe sensitivities of rK39 ICT, p-ELISA and IFAT were 100%, 86.5% and 92.3%, respectively. All three serological methods had a pooled sensitivity of 82.6%. The specificities of rK39 ICT, p-ELISA and IFAT from combined control groups were 100%, 93.1% and 99.9%, respectively. The respective positive and negative predictive values of the tests were both 100% for rK39 ICT, 66.3% and 97.8% for p-ELISA and 99.3% and 98.8% for IFAT. The p-ELISA showed cross reactivity with 36.3% of sera positive for malaria and 28.6% of sera positive for Chagas disease while rK39 ICT and IFAT showed no cross reactivity.

conclusionThis study confirms the efficiency of rK39 ICT for rapid diagnosis of VL. The p-ELISA using mixed promastigote antigens did not perform well as a serological test for VL in Bangladesh. Due to high sensitivity and specificity of whole promastigote antigen of

Indexed as

IFATp-ELISAPredictive valuerK39 ICTSensitivitySpecificityVisceral leishmaniasis

Identifiers

PMID29988192
PMCPMC5991841
OpenAlexW2493536630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.