Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988149›Full record

ArticleCell death & disease2018

Dynamic placement of the linker histone H1 associated with nucleosome arrangement and gene transcription in early Drosophila embryonic development.

Jian Hu, Liang Gu, Youqiong Ye, Meizhu Zheng, Zhu Xu, Jing Lin, Yanhua Du, Mengxue Tian, Lifang Luo, Beibei Wang and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell death & disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Physical modeling of nucleosome clustering in euchromatin resulting from interactions between epigenetic reader proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Mesoscale modeling reveals formation of an epigenetically driven HOXC gene hub.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jian HuInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Liang GuInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Youqiong YeInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Meizhu ZhengInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Zhu XuInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Jing LinInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Yanhua DuInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Mengxue TianInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Lifang LuoInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Beibei WangInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Xiaobai ZhangInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China.
Zhiping WengProgram in Bioinformatics and Integrative Biology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA.
Cizhong JiangInstitute of Translational Research, Tongji Hospital, the School of Life Sciences and Technology, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Signaling and Disease Research, the Collaborative Innovation Center for Brain Science, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200092, China. czjiang@tongji.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-5406-2360
Tongji University · CNUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31271373National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31721003National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31771419
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The linker histone H1 is critical to maintenance of higher-order chromatin structures and to gene expression regulation. However, H1 dynamics and its functions in embryonic development remain unresolved. Here, we profiled gene expression, nucleosome positions, and H1 locations in early Drosophila embryos. The results show that H1 binding is positively correlated with the stability of beads-on-a-string nucleosome organization likely through stabilizing nucleosome positioning and maintaining nucleosome spacing. Strikingly, nucleosomes with H1 placement deviating to the left or the right relative to the dyad shift to the left or the right, respectively, during early Drosophila embryonic development. H1 occupancy on genic nucleosomes is inversely correlated with nucleosome distance to the transcription start sites. This inverse correlation reduces as gene transcription levels decrease. Additionally, H1 occupancy is lower at the 5' border of genic nucleosomes than that at the 3' border. This asymmetrical pattern of H1 occupancy on genic nucleosomes diminishes as gene transcription levels decrease. These findings shed new lights into how H1 placement dynamics correlates with nucleosome positioning and gene transcription during early Drosophila embryonic development.

Indexed as

AnimalsChromatinChromatin Assembly and DisassemblyDrosophilaEmbryonic DevelopmentHistonesNucleosomesTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticChromatinHistonesNucleosomesTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID29988149
PMCPMC6037678
OpenAlexW2820104646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.