ArticleBritish journal of cancer2018
ERK and p38MAPK combine to improve survival in patients with BRAF mutant colorectal cancer.
Article in British journal of cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- MiR-3614-5p Is a Potential Novel Biomarker for Colorectal Cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Racially Disparate Expression of mTOR/ERK-1/2 Allied Proteins in Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Decreased concentrations of intracellular signaling proteins in colon cancer patients with BRAF mutations.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- p38β and Cancer: The Beginning of the Road.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Shear stress activates ATOH8 via autocrine VEGF promoting glycolysis dependent-survival of colorectal cancer cells in the circulation.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2020Article
- Article
- Reply to comment of "ERK and p38MAPK combine to improve survival in patients with BRAF mutant colorectal cancer".British journal of cancer · 2018Article
- Comment on "ERK and p38MAPK combine to improve survival in patients with BRAF mutant colorectal cancer".British journal of cancer · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn colorectal cancer (CRC), BRAF mutations influence tumour progression. In mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumours, BRAF mutations are associated with a good prognosis, whereas in MMR-competent tumours, they are detrimental. The differential expression of the downstream MAPK pathway members, which are constitutively activated in BRAF mutant patients, may account for these differences.
methodsPhosphorylation of ERK, p38MAPK and JNK was assessed by immunohistochemistry, utilising CRC tissue microarrays. A discovery cohort (n = 187) and a validation cohort (n = 801) were analysed for associations with BRAF mutations, clinicopathological characteristics and cancer-specific survival (CSS).
resultsIn 801 CRC patients, nuclear ERK phosphorylation (HR 0.65 95% CI 0.48-0.88, p = 0.004) and the combined nuclear pERK/p-p38 score (HR 0.61 95% CI 0.45-0.82, p = 0.001) were independently associated with CSS, and were further associated with increased BRAF mutations (p = 0.003 and p = 0.002). When stratified for BRAF status, only MMR-competent patients harbouring the mutation and a strong combined nuclear pERK/p-p38 score (HR 0.49 95% CI 0.27-0.89, p = 0.016) demonstrated improved CSS. This improvement in CSS was specific to stage III CRC (HR 0.25 95% CI 0.10-0.64, p = 0.002).
conclusionsMMR-competent stage III tumours harbouring BRAF mutations have an improved prognosis when strong nuclear phosphorylation of both ERK and p38MAPK is present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.