Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988104›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2018

Sucrose preference test for measurement of stress-induced anhedonia in mice.

Meng-Ying Liu, Chun-Yu Yin, Li-Juan Zhu, Xian-Hui Zhu, Chu Xu, Chun-Xia Luo, Hongshan Chen, Dong-Ya Zhu, Qi-Gang Zhou

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 456 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
456citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

456 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 977 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

396 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meng-Ying LiuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chun-Yu YinDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Li-Juan ZhuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Xian-Hui ZhuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chu XuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Chun-Xia LuoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Hongshan ChenKey Laboratory of Cardiovascular & Cerebrovascular Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. hongshanchen@njmu.edu.cn.
Dong-Ya ZhuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. dyzhu@njmu.edu.cn.
Qi-Gang ZhouDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy College, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China. qigangzhou@njmu.edu.cn.
Nanjing Medical University · CNSoutheast University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anhedonia is the inability to experience pleasure from rewarding or enjoyable activities and is a core symptom of depression in humans. Here, we describe a protocol for the measurement of anhedonia in mice, in which anhedonia is measured by a sucrose preference test (SPT) based on a two-bottle choice paradigm. A reduction in the sucrose preference ratio in experimental relative to control mice is indicative of anhedonia. To date, inconsistent and variable results have been reported following the use of the SPT by different groups, probably due to the use of different protocols and equipment. In this protocol, we describe how to set up a clearly defined apparatus for SPT and provide a detailed protocol to ensure greater consistency when carrying out SPT. This optimized protocol is highly sensitive, reliable, and adaptable for evaluation of chronic stress-related anhedonia, as well as morphine-induced dependence. The whole SPT, including adaptation, baseline measurement, and testing, takes 8 d.

Indexed as

AnhedoniaFood PreferencesAnimalsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineDisease Models, AnimalMiceStress, PsychologicalSucroseSweetening AgentsSucroseSweetening Agents

Identifiers

PMID29988104
OpenAlexW2865698779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.