Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29988077›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2018

Landscape of pathogenic variations in a panel of 34 genes and cancer risk estimation from 5131 HBOC families.

Laurent Castéra, Valentin Harter, Etienne Muller, Sophie Krieger, Nicolas Goardon, Agathe Ricou, Antoine Rousselin, Germain Paimparay, Angelina Legros, Olivia Bruet and 11 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Summary ofGenes · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The Genetic and Molecular Analyses of Rare Candidate GermlineInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Mutations ofGenes · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Laurent CastéraLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France. l.castera@baclesse.fr.
Valentin HarterLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Etienne MullerLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Sophie KriegerLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Nicolas GoardonLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Agathe RicouLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Antoine RousselinLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Germain PaimparayLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Angelina LegrosLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Olivia BruetLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Céline QuesnelleLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Florian DominLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Chankannira SanLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Baptiste BraultLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Robin FouilletLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Caroline AbadieDepartment of Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France.
Odile BéraDepartment of Genetics, CHU, Fort de France, France.
Pascaline BerthetDepartment of Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
French Exome Project Consortium
Thierry FrébourgInserm U1245, Rouen University, Normandy Centre for Genomic and Personalized Medicine, Rouen, France.
Dominique VaurLaboratory of Cancer Biology and Genetics, Comprehensive Cancer Center François Baclesse, Caen, France.
Centre François Baclesse · FRInserm · FRCentre Eugène Marquis · FRCentre François Baclesse · LUCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Martinique · MQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIntegration of gene panels in the diagnosis of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) requires a careful evaluation of the risk associated with pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants (PVs) detected in each gene. Here we analyzed 34 genes in 5131 suspected HBOC index cases by next-generation sequencing.

methodsUsing the Exome Aggregation Consortium data sets plus 571 individuals from the French Exome Project, we simulated the probability that an individual from the Exome Aggregation Consortium carries a PV and compared it to the estimated frequency within the HBOC population.

resultsOdds ratio conferred by PVs within BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, RAD51D, ATM, BRIP1, CHEK2, and MSH6 were estimated at 13.22 [10.01-17.22], 8.61 [6.78-10.82], 8.22 [4.91-13.05], 4.54 [2.55-7.48], 5.23 [1.46-13.17], 3.20 [2.14-4.53], 2.49 [1.42-3.97], 1.67 [1.18-2.27], and 2.50 [1.12-4.67], respectively. PVs within RAD51C, RAD51D, and BRIP1 were associated with ovarian cancer family history (OR = 11.36 [5.78-19.59], 12.44 [2.94-33.30] and 3.82 [1.66-7.11]). PALB2 PVs were associated with bilateral breast cancer (OR = 16.17 [5.48-34.10]) and BARD1 PVs with triple-negative breast cancer (OR = 11.27 [3.37-25.01]). Burden tests performed in both patients and the French Exome Project population confirmed the association of PVs of BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and RAD51C with HBOC.

conclusionOur results validate the integration of PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D in the diagnosis of HBOC and suggest that the other genes are involved in an oligogenic determinism.

Indexed as

AdultBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinDNA-Binding ProteinsExome SequencingFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinFranceGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGenetic VariationHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm ProteinsRisk FactorsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, humanDNA-Binding ProteinsFanconi Anemia Complementation Group N ProteinNeoplasm ProteinsPALB2 protein, humanRAD51C protein, humanRAD51D protein, humangenetic risk estimationHBOCpanel gene sequencing

Identifiers

PMID29988077
OpenAlexW2841045415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.