Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987765›Full record

ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2019

Model-guided search for optimal natural-science-category training exemplars: A work in progress.

Robert M Nosofsky, Craig A Sanders, Xiaojin Zhu, Mark A McDaniel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. High coherence among training exemplars promotes broad generalization of face families.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coherent category training enhances generalization in prototype-based categories.Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Robert M NosofskyPsychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 1101 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA. nosofsky@indiana.edu.
Craig A SandersPsychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University Bloomington, 1101 E. Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.
Xiaojin ZhuUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Mark A McDanielWashington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Funding

Directorate for Education and Human Resources 1534014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under the guidance of a formal exemplar model of categorization, we conduct comparisons of natural-science classification learning across four conditions in which the nature of the training examples is manipulated. The specific domain of inquiry is rock classification in the geologic sciences; the goal is to use the model to search for optimal training examples for teaching the rock categories. On the positive side, the model makes a number of successful predictions: Most notably, compared with conditions involving focused training on small sets of training examples, generalization to novel transfer items is significantly enhanced in a condition in which learners experience a broad swath of training examples from each category. Nevertheless, systematic departures from the model predictions are also observed. Further analyses lead us to the hypothesis that the high-dimensional feature-space representation derived for the rock stimuli (to which the exemplar model makes reference) systematically underestimates within-category similarities. We suggest that this limitation is likely to arise in numerous situations in which investigators attempt to build detailed feature-space representations for naturalistic categories. A low-parameter extended version of the model that adjusts for this limitation provides dramatically improved accounts of performance across the four conditions. We outline future steps for enhancing the current feature-space representation and continuing our goal of using formal psychological models to guide the search for effective methods of teaching science categories.

Indexed as

Concept FormationLearningModels, PsychologicalNatural Science DisciplinesHumansModels of category learningPerceptual categorization and identificationSimilarity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.