ArticleFish physiology and biochemistry2019
Effects of dietary manipulation on compensatory growth of juvenile genetically improved farmed tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus).
Article in Fish physiology and biochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Coding and Noncoding Genes Involved in Atrophy and Compensatory Muscle Growth in Nile Tilapia.Cells · 2022Article
- Exploring the impacts of different fasting and refeeding regimes on Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.): growth performance, histopathological study, and expression levels of some muscle growth-related genes.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2022Article
- Under stress conditions, pacu Piaractus mesopotamicus modulates the metabolic allostatic load even after Dolops carvalhoi challenge to maintain self-protection mechanisms.Fish physiology and biochemistry · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
A 40-day feeding trial was conducted to investigate whether feeding a low-protein diet (25%) once daily for either 10 (L10H30) or 20 (L20H20) days then re-feeding a high-protein diet (35%) thrice daily elicit compensatory growth (CG) in genetically improved farmed tilapia (GIFT), Oreochromis niloticus (11.02 ± 0.05 g). Fish on the control treatment were fed 35% protein diet over 40 days (H40). Fish were stocked into nine 100-L tanks (30 fish per tank) with 3 replicate tanks for each group. Growth performance, feed utilization, proximate composition of body compartment, serum biochemical parameters, and hepatopancreatic histology and expressions of some genes related to inflammatory cytokine were evaluated every 10 days. Growth of L10H30 fish were similar to the control, whereas the weight of L20H20 fish were lower (P < 0.05) at day 20, but this significant difference disappeared at the end of the experiment. During 20-30 days, specific growth rate and feed intake were significantly higher (P < 0.05) and feed efficiency was lower (P < 0.05) in L20H20 fish than those in H40 fish. Dietary manipulations did not affect (P > 0.05) viscerosomatic and hepatosomatic indices, condition factors, serum biochemical parameters, and hepatopancreatic histology. Significant differences (P < 0.05) in proximate composition were observed only in viscera and muscle between L20H20 fish and H40 fish at day 20. The mRNA expressions of heat shock protein 70 kDa, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin (IL)-1β were higher (P < 0.05) in L10H30 and L20H20 fish at day 10, while IL-1β mRNA expression was lower (P < 0.05) in L20H20 fish at day 30 than those in H40 fish. Our results indicated that L20H20 fish elicited a complete CG and induced reversible physiological variations in juvenile GIFT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.