Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29987688›Full record

ArticleNeurocritical care2019

Continuous Assessment of "Optimal" Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study of Feasibility, Reliability, and Relation to Outcome.

Andreas H Kramer, Philippe L Couillard, David A Zygun, Marcel J Aries, Clare N Gallagher

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurocritical care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The pressure reactivity index as a measure of cerebral autoregulation and its application in traumatic brain injury management.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2023
    Review
  8. Lung Injury Risk in Traumatic Brain Injury Managed With Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Guided-Therapy.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andreas H KramerDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. Andreas.Kramer@AlbertaHealthServices.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4008-4758
Philippe L CouillardDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
David A ZygunDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Marcel J AriesDepartment of Intensive Care, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Clare N GallagherDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend maintaining cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) between 60 and 70 mmHg in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), but acknowledge that optimal CPP may vary depending on cerebral blood flow autoregulation. Previous retrospective studies suggest that targeting CPP where the pressure reactivity index (PRx) is optimized (CPP

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study involving TBI patients who underwent PRx monitoring to assess issues of feasibility relevant to future interventional studies: (1) the proportion of time that CPP

resultsIn 71 patients, CPP

conclusionProspective interventional clinical trials with regular determination of CPP

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationIntracranial PressureOutcome Assessment, Health CareAdolescentAdultBrain Injuries, TraumaticFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeurophysiological MonitoringReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAutoregulationCerebral blood flow (CBF)Cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)Inter-observer agreementPressure reactivity index (PRx)Traumatic brain injury (TBI)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.